Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]RE: [tlug] Vendor lock-in vs monopoly
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 09:27:42 +0900
- From: <burlingk@example.com>
- Subject: RE: [tlug] Vendor lock-in vs monopoly
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Mazur > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 7:36 PM > > >From this snippet it looks more like he's speaking about software >*support* rather than the software itself. > >If you purchase proprietary software, only one company can give >support because only that one company has the source code. > That is not completely accurate. Anyone can support a product that they know. There are many companies that make money doing just that. The true lockin comes from interactions between companies (I know, this is not my idea, but was mentioned in another email). The only monopoly-like aspect is that you can only buy THAT piece of software from that company. You can in many cases still find alternatives. If the company chooses to use a software, that is the companies choice. At the moment, MS Office is still the industry standard. That is slowly changing. :-P I think in a few years, Open Office will have the upper hand (I know, I am being optimistic). Until then, many companies are choosing MS Office. That is not a monopoly, that is a consumer choice. Open Source is all about freedom of choice. We need to remember that part of that freedom is the freedom to choose the software they want to use, even if it is not the software we like. My personal choice would be to encourage people to use Open Office. Not because it is free, but because it is a good package. The free part is an added bonus. For the average end user, the fact that it is open source is no real concern. They can use it. The only time that it becomes a concern for them, is when the producer of the software refuses to provide a binary distrobution of the software. In which case the average user won't even concider it as an option. It is useless to them, because they can't run a compiler and only have one if someone else on the machine uses it. The fact that Open Office does provide binaries for pretty much every supported operating system is a big plus for them. :-) -- Ken
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] Hardware price/performance article
- Next by Date: RE: [tlug] dual boot - Windows/Linux
- Previous by thread: [tlug] Vendor lock-in vs monopoly
- Next by thread: [tlug] Hardware price/performance article
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links