Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Recommended light weight browser
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:56:08 +0900
- From: "Nguyen Vu Hung" <vuhung16plus@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Recommended light weight browser
- References: <14178ED3A898524FB036966D696494FB139076@messenger.cv63.navy.mil> <1195544468.2440.1.camel@Beerislife>
2007/11/20, Wayne <fedorawayne@example.com>: > > Also, is it not possible to go back to Firefox 2.0.0.8? I've the ChangeLog file so I won't go back to 2.0.0.8 :D > I much prefer to use Swiftfox under Linux. Especially with Fedora as > their build is sloooooow and the font rendering in Swiftfox is better. Do you "feel" it is faster than FF 2.0.0.9? I've downloaded and started it: I turns out to be a FF 1.5. Is there any mistakes here? Anyway, from developers' point of view, at least for my pen IV, SSE and MMX are not the magics that be able to change the performance dramatically. -> http://getswiftfox.com/builds/releases/buildconfig-pentium4.html It is just a "optimization" build and I could not see any benchmark vs. other browser ( or at least FF ) -- Best Regards, Nguyen Hung Vu vuhung16plus{remove}@example.com An inquisitive look at Harajuku http://www.flickr.com/photos/vuhung/sets/72157600109218238/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Recommended light weight browser
- From: Scott Robbins
- References:
- RE: [tlug] Recommended light weight browser
- From: burlingk
- RE: [tlug] Recommended light weight browser
- From: Wayne
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Recommended light weight browser
- Next by Date: Re: Linux docs (was:Re: [tlug] Re: IPv6)
- Previous by thread: RE: [tlug] Recommended light weight browser
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Recommended light weight browser
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links