Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Speaking of computer usage ....
- Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:06:55 +0900
- From: Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Speaking of computer usage ....
- References: <ed10ee420802282026q44b13db7neb011ba53e4d4fe2@mail.gmail.com> <20080229113407.103654af.attila@kinali.ch> <874pbrljgk.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20080301002855.GA27870@phb> <87ve46kiua.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <001101c87ba4$7bc7e510$7357af30$@com> <87r6etki1m.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On 2008-03-02 10:53 +0900 (Sun), Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Precisely. "Professions" as conventionally thought of are represented > by the medical profession and the legal profession. Let's not forget engineering here. > Both of which prominently feature ethical commitments as requirement > of membership, specifically to keeping up with the state of the art > and acting in a clients' interest. Note that ethical requirements of doctors and Professional Engineers (PEs, from this point on) are of a somewhat different nature than those of attorneys. The difference is most clearly shown in the nature of a PE's obligations versus an attorney's. A PE is required to place the good of society ahead of the good of his client; an attorney is the exact reverse. > It's a kind of euphemism to call somebody a professional merely > because they get paid. Not at all; it's just a different use of the word. It's the exact difference between an Olympic athlete and someone involved in professional sports, in this different use. I believe I understand your use of the word professional, but I can think of common situations where it's not used in this sense. For example, an Olympic figure skater is generally contrasted with professional figure skater, and an art photographer is generally contrasted with a professional photographer, even though in both cases they do work of as good or better quality than their professional counterparts, and often have stronger motivation to do good work. > The magic of open source software is quite apparent when you consider > how the aggregate of random responsible actions under voluntary > coordination is something as reliable (ie, responsible on demand) as > the Linux kernel. Actually, I'd disagree with that. I've not found open source software, in and of itself, to be any less or more reliable in some given instance than commerical software. The main advantage I find in it is that when something breaks, I have far more places to go for support, including the option of doing it myself. cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> +81 90 7737 2974 Mobile sites and software consulting: http://www.starling-software.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Speaking of computer usage ....
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Speaking of computer usage ....
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Speaking of computer usage ....
- From: Dave Brown
- Re: [tlug] Speaking of computer usage ....
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- RE: [tlug] Speaking of computer usage ....
- From: Kenneth M Burling Jr
- RE: [tlug] Speaking of computer usage ....
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Linux vs windows satire
- Next by Date: [tlug] Booting LINUX from an external hard disk
- Previous by thread: RE: [tlug] Speaking of computer usage ....
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Speaking of computer usage ....
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links