Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] rsync efficiency (was: The Mother of All (bash) Commands)
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:33:51 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] rsync efficiency (was: The Mother of All (bash) Commands)
- References: <op.t756gdbtp3esx5@mail.gol.com> <200803171322.13584.daniel.ramaley@drake.edu> <20080317210112.T39931@isris.pair.com> <200803180822.19747.daniel.ramaley@drake.edu> <20080318155544.79e7efac.attila@kinali.ch> <20080322090456.GH5267@lucky.cynic.net> <20080331135150.aab7cce9.attila@kinali.ch> <d8fcc0800803311654i7e164418l37520bfba4d8b383@mail.gmail.com> <20080401100653.0d83629d.attila@kinali.ch> <d8fcc0800804011716m5168fa6bqc650cf5be8b70369@mail.gmail.com>
Josh Glover writes: > On 01/04/2008, Attila Kinali <attila@example.com> wrote: > > > Yes, but would you call a sorting algorithm fast, if it would > > perform good on random sorted data (O(n*log(n)), but take o(exp(n)) > > if the data is reverse ordered? Yes, it might be a pathological > > case, but if this pathological case is actually quite common, > > then the algorithm as a big flaw. > > The point here should be a period, and quickly!
- References:
- Re: [tlug] rsync efficiency (was: The Mother of All (bash) Commands)
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] rsync efficiency (was: The Mother of All (bash) Commands)
- From: Attila Kinali
- Re: [tlug] rsync efficiency (was: The Mother of All (bash) Commands)
- From: Josh Glover
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] "Open source: Made in Japan?" blog
- Next by Date: OSS and getting money for it (was: [tlug] Re: Why Vista Sucks)
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] rsync efficiency (was: The Mother of All (bash) Commands)
- Next by thread: [tlug] rsync efficiency (was: The Mother of All (bash) Commands)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links