Re: [tlug] Opera release

[Wayne <fedorawayne@example.com>]

On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 08:30 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> As for Firefox, though Godwin and some others disagree,  I did find
> 3.x
> to be far faster and less resource intensive than FF-2.  My main
> server-cum-workstation at home runs CentOS, which only has 1.x--though
> as RH upgrades, it should change within a week or so.  I just
> downloaded
> the tarball from Mozilla and run that. 

Hi Scott,

beta 5 of FF3 was unpredictable here, it would fold without warning, a
bit like me after a few pints :) Leigh in the forum posted some FF3
RC2 RPMs, which were very good, and yes, it was faster, only I like to
use Epiphany for a couple of sites and it would die with the version
of xulrunner included with his RPMs. Going back to FF2 or using the
Moz version of RC2 was the only choice.

Wayne