Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:54:59 +0900
- From: Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- References: <c0f4e2b00806140549r1b18f3c1mc38c83fe02614d17@mail.gmail.com> <20080614140131.GC11395@lucky.cynic.net> <87r6azitbm.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On 2008-06-15 06:45 +0900 (Sun), Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Curt Sampson writes: > > > However, the above addresses are multicast addresses, and thus all > > computers see them (assuming that they're running software that's > > listening). > > I don't much like that way of expressing it. I would say on an > Ethernet all computers see all messages (that's why it's called an > "ether"). I'll get into the rest of the thread later, but this is important. That every computer will see every packet is a very, very poor assumption to make. Most every "Ethernet concentrator" (to use the old term) is a switch these days, and your computer won't see anything that the switch doesn't know it should forward to you. Even before this, there was always the possibility of bridging. cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> +81 90 7737 2974 Mobile sites and software consulting: http://www.starling-software.com
- References:
- [tlug] [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- From: Bruno Raoult
- Re: [tlug] [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] RMS is at it again
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] RMS is at it again
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- Next by thread: [tlug] Re: [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links