Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Re: Somewhat OT- open source software for US voting machines
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:32:09 +0900
- From: Edward Middleton <emiddleton@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Re: Somewhat OT- open source software for US voting machines
- References: <5634e9210810070318s1c33aeaap3f9069d95634afb7@mail.gmail.com> <ed10ee420810080046n530ea969uaecb6ffd842bf6dd@mail.gmail.com> <48ED5873.8080008@bebear.net> <8763o2zcdb.fsf@xemacs.org>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080929)
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Edward Middleton writes: > > In Australia we have compulsory voting so it is arguable that some > > voters intentionally made invalid votes. In the US voting is > > voluntary so the likelihood of this is very low, > > That's false. A statistically significant percentage of "spoiled > ballots" really are just that, an intentional signal that the voter > feels disenfranchised by the process or the set of candidates on > offer. People really do vote for Mickey Mouse or the last (dead) > President that they liked as a protest. > "a statistically significant percentage" or "the statistically significant percentage"? I imagine mick mouse and dead presidents get their fair share of votes but is that the majority of votes that failed to reflect the voters preference? > > i.e. a significant number of voters preferences were not recorded > > by the current process and that may have effected the outcome of > > the election. > > As several people have pointed out, this is probably true of all > voting systems in existence. > That may be the case, it is impossible to know. The issues is the degree to which voters preferences are not reflected in the election result. Mugabe might have won the presidential election in Zimbabwe, but a significant number of voters preferences were not reflected in the outcome which calls into question the outcome of the election. > The important thing about the U.S. process to note is that in the end > there's usually very little difference between the platforms of the > candidates. I am not disagreeing with you here but it is still important that the voting public has confidence in the process even if they don't like the candidates. > So the American people are generally getting what they want AFAICS; > it's only a few fringes who really have any dissatisfaction to > express. > The fringe that got the HAVA[1] passed, or those complaining about the changes it mandated? Edward 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help_America_Vote_Act
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Re: Somewhat OT- open source software for US voting machines
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [tlug] Re: Somewhat OT- open source software for US voting machines
- From: Jim Breen
- Re: [tlug] Re: Somewhat OT- open source software for US voting machines
- From: SL Baur
- Re: [tlug] Re: Somewhat OT- open source software for US voting machines
- From: Edward Middleton
- Re: [tlug] Re: Somewhat OT- open source software for US voting machines
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Somewhat OT- open source software for US voting machines
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Re: Somewhat OT- open source software for US voting machines
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Re: Somewhat OT- open source software for US voting machines
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Re: Somewhat OT- open source software for US voting machines
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links