Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:56:47 +0200
- From: Christian Horn <chorn@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- References: <956ae5a90906030336lb7145c9nd52744bb1804c853@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 11:36:59AM +0100, Doug McLean wrote: > > I am busy getting all the apps on there. Since I haven't used BSD in > a while, I'd like to open the discussion to fellow users and ask, what > is your preference? Ports or packages? hobbyist standpoint (production is all linux here): ports, only for big stuff like OpenOffice packages. On OpenBSD also pkgsrc should be investigated. > Off-topic, but recently I > discovered I can play classic Total Annihiliation (a windows game) on > a virtual Ubuntu instance (using WINE) running on a Mac pretty > seamlessly. Windows game on Linux running on a Mac...who would've > thought possible years ago? Indeed, played through 'C&C red alert 3' last year only using wine and linux. Christian
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- From: Josh Glover
- References:
- [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- From: Doug McLean
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- Previous by thread: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] BSD: Ports or Packages?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links