Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] SSDs
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:47:51 +0200
- From: David Santinoli <marauder@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] SSDs
- References: <20090811134826.GB4216@example.com> <ea4e853e0908111741h41c4e111i50766760849c1b9b@example.com> <20090812010734.GC4321@example.com> <ea4e853e0908120416q51257372xdc08cd0d77d407d3@example.com> <20090812195715.GA2388@example.com> <ea4e853e0908130000o3b2868ado86e2675500e21048@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 04:00:51PM +0900, Lyle H Saxon wrote: > My biggest concern is reliability and longevity. If the hard drive > has to read from a large file on one part of the disk, and write to a > new file on another part of the disk, I recall videos of the > mechanical motions of an HDD, and it seems that it would be a lot > smoother (and less mechanically stressing) to have one HDD reading > from the large file and and having the new file being created on a > separate HDD.... In principle, yes. But unless your single drive performs this kind of task 24/7, I'd be reluctant to believe it would significantly decrease its lifetime. Want true mechanical stress? Enjoy rsync on a DVD-RAM. :-) David
- References:
- [tlug] SSDs
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] SSDs
- From: Lyle H Saxon
- Re: [tlug] SSDs
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] SSDs
- From: Lyle H Saxon
- Re: [tlug] SSDs
- From: David Santinoli
- Re: [tlug] SSDs
- From: Lyle H Saxon
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Yes! Another argument about the GPL!
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Zurus distributions experience
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] SSDs
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] SSDs
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links