Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] comand-line recording...
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:05:02 +0900
- From: Bruno Raoult <braoult@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] comand-line recording...
- References: <20090926110314.GA16381@example.com> <20090926130503.GB16381@example.com> <200909270030.37285.tlug@example.com> <c0f4e2b00909260748p7570cd36lad848ef24df94c83@example.com> <87d45dn40s.fsf@example.com> <87fxa9n5lx.fsf@example.com> <c0f4e2b00909260641x1bd35d27h8ebb14a1e14b336f@example.com> <20090927154133.GD1381@example.com> <c0f4e2b00909272358v1d9cc34cl14985694b5aad177@example.com> <20090928072859.GH9366@example.com>
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 16:28, Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> wrote: > On 2009-09-28 15:58 +0900 (Mon), Bruno Raoult wrote: >> Yes, the only thing I want to protect is the log file... > > This is what I really don't get. Basically, a logfile that doesn't show > what really happened is fine, so long as it was produced in one way, > rather than another. The situation: Developers and support people. They all have access to production machines. Audit does not like it. "Segregating" roles is necessary, what we cannot ( support team being too small). So what I proposed the audit was: "we cannot avoid to have developers accessing our production environment. But we will have a log of what they do on this environment. Thay said it was an acceptable solution. And by the way, this log is not necessary for support people, but I will not make a different setup for practical reasons. >> 1) The generic account history file will be shared by all >> support/developers, and we would be unable to find who really typed a >> given command. > > This makes things even more interesting. I don't use generic > accounts myself, for a lot of very good reasons, but you appear to > be saying something along the lines of Joe logging in and saying, > "record-my-actions as fred" is ok, or even forgetting to run the > "record-my-actions" command is ok, but Joe doing something like > "record-my-actions as joe" and then later doing "mv joe.log fred.log" is > not acceptable. I am sure you do use generic accounts. root is one. If you have an "apache" server, what is its uid? Yours? Surely not. OK: This is not "Joe" being "Fred", but both "Joe" and "Fred" (as known persons) becoming "generic server account" (for instance "apache"). Imagine a system where we have a server. This server has to be managed by different people, so it is "generic". My target is to know what Fred and what Joe did on this specific account... I want to know that Fred changed a config file, on Wednesday 3:00, and I want to know that Joe did something at 3:05 on the same file. And They should not be able to change this history files (syslog is fine, then)... Bruno. -- 2 + 2 = 5, for very large values of 2.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] comand-line recording...
- From: Curt Sampson
- References:
- Re: [tlug] comand-line recording...
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] comand-line recording...
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] comand-line recording...
- From: tlug
- Re: [tlug] comand-line recording...
- From: Bruno Raoult
- Re: [tlug] comand-line recording...
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] comand-line recording...
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] comand-line recording...
- From: Bruno Raoult
- Re: [tlug] comand-line recording...
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] comand-line recording...
- From: Bruno Raoult
- Re: [tlug] comand-line recording...
- From: Curt Sampson
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] comand-line recording...
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Open-source repository question
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] comand-line recording...
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] comand-line recording...
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links