Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] state of the art filtering
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:08:27 +0100
- From: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] state of the art filtering
- References: <20100316092524.c153a4a9.attila@example.com> <201003161358.41373.fcartegnie@example.com> <20100318112154.b6aed567.attila@example.com> <4BA207EA.3020502@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Lewske Wada wrote: > I agree with Attila. > > With spamassassin, you can whitelist an important address as below, > in case it does mistakes identifying spam from ham. > But you have no way to do the same for RBLs. > > In /etc/spamassassin/local.cf : > whitelist_from edward.middleton@example.com Note that whitelist_from provides only a modest negative score. There's also morespam_from and all_spam_from, but even the combined score of all three is not enough to make a GTUBE mail go through (which I consider a bug in the ruleset). http://spamassassin.apache.org/gtube/ FWIW: score GTUBE 1000.000 score USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO -6.000 score USER_IN_MORE_SPAM_TO -20.000 score USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO -100.000 'all spam' should mean all spam and not almost all IMHO... -- Tobias PGP: http://8ef7ddba.uguu.de
- References:
- [tlug] state of the art spam filtering
- From: Attila Kinali
- Re: [tlug] state of the art spam filtering
- From: Francois Cartegnie
- Re: [tlug] state of the art spam filtering
- From: Attila Kinali
- Re: [tlug] state of the art spam filtering
- From: Lewske Wada
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] state of the art filtering
- Next by Date: [tlug] Amazon Web Services Study Group meeting, April 6 19:00
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] state of the art spam filtering
- Next by thread: [tlug] can anyone help ..I need to repair my grub ...
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links