Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] shell
- Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 23:44:42 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] shell
- References: <4C676172.7090806@example.com> <AANLkTimxu4HnaVEhDgMRvTXVHA8up_BsuavF=-XWTwG-@example.com> <AANLkTi=OGqwNtrBK5SMatP3Yu4=cbudyqHS4q7NONbDt@example.com>
Kenneth Burling writes: > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Pier Fumagalli > <pier@example.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 12:39, Lewske Wada <ryu@example.com> wrote: > >> [...] Operating system shells generally fall into one of two > >> categories: command-line and graphical. Command-line shells > >> provide a command-line interface (CLI) to the operating system, > >> while graphical shells provide a graphical user interface (GUI). > > > > Basically, the Shell covers the innards so you don't have to see > it. :P Kind of like a turtle or a snail. Except for two facts. First, shells are scriptable. It is very easy to make a CLI scriptable: just read command input from stdin. It's much harder to make a GUI scriptable at present, and either way Explorer doesn't qualify AFAICS. Second, the standard shell as defined by POSIX is a CLI. So you can call Explorer a "shell" if you like, but in a Unix context that will just get you odd looks from anybody with a clue. I bet that in a Windows context it will get you odd looks from the clued and the clueless alike. :-)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] shell
- From: Kenneth Burling
- References:
- [tlug] shell
- From: Lewske Wada
- Re: [tlug] shell
- From: Pier Fumagalli
- Re: [tlug] shell
- From: Kenneth Burling
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] bash and grep and diff
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] shell
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] shell
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] shell
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links