
Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlug] Current practices for Linux partioning?
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:25:20 +0900
- From: Edward Middleton <edward.middleton@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Current practices for Linux partioning?
- References: <4F84A345.1060200@yamame.org>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.22) Gecko/20120203 Thunderbird/3.1.14
On 04/11/2012 06:16 AM, Jonathan Byrne wrote:
> As I prepare to upgrade my Envy 15 from Win 7 to Linux, what your
> thoughts around partitioning? Should I hold my nose and make a / big
> enough to contain /usr, or should I Do Things The Way I've Always Done
> Them, which is this partitioning scheme:
>
> /
> /boot
> swap
> /tmp
> /usr
> /usr/local
> /opt
> /srv
> /var
> /var/spool (if it's a system that will be running an SMTP daemon; in
> this case, not)
> /home
My standard approach is to put everything on software raid then add
dmcrypt then lvm for things that need it. I also add partitions as
needed rather then at the start. I am very interested in moving to
btrfs but they still don't have offline recovery.
/boot - raid1
/ - raid1 -> dmcrypt -> lvm
/usr/portage - raid0 -> lvm
/home - raid1 -> dmcrypt -> lvm
Edward
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index