Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Flash Memory History & BIOS Durability (or lack thereof)
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:52:16 +0900
- From: Lyle H Saxon <llletters@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Flash Memory History & BIOS Durability (or lack thereof)
- References: <CACDLhbYVe3AQqvP0uzSpqX073ZA9Tu=g+tMPrLz_t8fQ24h8sw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKXLc7ekUh+hZouOb02TJfm2t3pUp8_YE9urmX08M4U+EwD04w@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kalin KOZHUHAROV <me.kalin@example.com> wrote: > PC XT (i8088 or i8086 based), PC AT (i80386, i80486), and some (not > sure if Pentums were counted as AT), had BIOS in ROM and no upgrades > meant erasing with UV and reprogramming with a ROM programmer. > CMOS has always been there AFAIR and there was always a battery to > keep at least the RTC. Okay. Thanks! I see I should have researched things a bit more before posting! Lyle
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Flash Memory History & BIOS Durability (or lack thereof)
- From: Edward Middleton
- References:
- [tlug] Flash Memory History & BIOS Durability (or lack thereof)
- From: Lyle H Saxon
- Re: [tlug] Flash Memory History & BIOS Durability (or lack thereof)
- From: Kalin KOZHUHAROV
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Flash Memory History & BIOS Durability (or lack thereof)
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Favorite Linux laptops these days?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Flash Memory History & BIOS Durability (or lack thereof)
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Flash Memory History & BIOS Durability (or lack thereof)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links