Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] [OT] plonk [Re: Classes]
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 13:01:58 +0200
- From: Bruno Raoult <braoult@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] [OT] plonk [Re: Classes]
- References: <20120527145445.GF5947@nashi.hw.39mm.net> <201205272228.q4RMSKno032329@b.mail.sonic.net> <20120527232932.GA551@scott1.scottro.net> <87ehq4vhjs.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <CAEiui-tmGVC8368G8sqDGnUnFQETa3D0v-xaZ-DAWVjhoJxDAA@mail.gmail.com> <87aa0rvcxb.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <CAEiui-ueJZcW11p_LRn3Ctcp-5Os+80jVzzXu+XV3cLjqX3itQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all,
Long time I did not participate to this list, as I had 2 difficult moves to London then France :-)
But this thread forces me to react...On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Holway <andrew.holway@example.com> wrote:
[...]
> > I will however top post
> Welcome to the moderation queue! I hope that doesn't discourage you
> from continuing to participate.
Go fuck yourself!
euh?? *You* may ask to change the rules, I am sure. But surely you need this group to agree!
You cannot make rules alone: If top posting is accepted here, why not? You should ask the
question instead of being rude... Meantime, following the current rules is the only option.> > In some respects I do agree with previous comments about elitism. Most
> > Lugs and linux people in general are somewhat horrific in this respect
> > and are extremely cliquey towards noobs.
>
> I've never noticed that LUGs or Linux people are elitist. In fact,
> they're very democratic: "If *I* could do it, so can *you*."[1]
Hum. To be seen... Maybe Andrew wanted to say "snob" instead of "elitist"?> What LUGs/Linux/OSS folks are intolerant of is laziness (even when
> expressed as "I don't have time to learn anything"), know-nothing-ism,
> and irresponsibility.
Out of topic, no?> As for cliquiness towards n00bs, I don't really feel sorry for
> people who think there's a justification for top-posting on a list
> where top-posting is forbidden.
It is forbidden by the group. Obviously, rules could change if a majority
goes for it. But surely it cannot be decided from 1 or 2 people...
As this is not the first time that this top-posting subject comes in, why not
asking the whole group what should be the rule? After all, I believe that today
95% of people use top-posting in the world, no?> Footnotes:> [2] The clause "is forbidden" is necessary here. I think that the
> interlinear, well-trimmed style is better in general despite the
> additional effort required. Nevertheless, see
> http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp/Teach/IntroSES/socsys-2.html.
There are some flaws there... Top posting has some advantages too:
You may find all information in one email. When people trim email,
which is *necessary* when you don't top-post, you just miss the whole subject,
and you have to find older emails to understand everything...
Well, this is not a clear subject, is it?
If there is a vote in this list, please consider I don't care (white vote): I will follow
the rule, whatever it is...
Bruno.
--
2 + 2 = 5, for very large values of 2.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] [OT] plonk [Re: Classes]
- From: Edward Middleton
- Re: [tlug] [OT] plonk [Re: Classes]
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [tlug] [OT] plonk [Re: Classes]
- From: Nicolas Limare
- Re: [tlug] [OT] plonk [Re: Classes]
- From: Chris Worthington
- Re: [tlug] [OT] plonk [Re: Classes]
- From: Scott Robbins
- Re: [tlug] [OT] plonk [Re: Classes]
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] [OT] plonk [Re: Classes]
- From: Andrew Holway
- Re: [tlug] [OT] plonk [Re: Classes]
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] [OT] plonk [Re: Classes]
- From: Andrew Holway
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] [OT] plonk [Re: Classes]
- Next by Date: [tlug] OT: elitism (was: plonk [Re: Classes])
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] [OT] plonk [Re: Classes]
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] [OT] plonk [Re: Classes]
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links