Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] l10n and icons: good example?
- Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 17:43:27 +0100
- From: Benjamin Tayehanpour <benjamin@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] l10n and icons: good example?
- References: <20140305081544.GA8571@fluxcoil.net> <53172277.50003@extellisys.com> <CAL-VO6JGsFncGPX5JYOhKOA670NUjeb+BZfNWSknimFAgUke+w@mail.gmail.com> <871tyfrj32.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20140306065048.GA11083@fluxcoil.net> <CAL-VO6Jv2PK66xBGbtvUQu7jq7TCwe_JS6aa--5q+8yMfe6eLQ@mail.gmail.com> <87ob1jpgyy.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
On 6 March 2014 14:57, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@example.com> wrote: > Editors sometimes use the checkmark to mean "needs check" (vs. authors > who use it to mean "checked and OK"). The Chicago Manual does not > recommend this usage, needless to say. We ought to standardise the usage across nations, remove the ambiguous symbols and instate some unambiguous ones. How about a scorch mark to indicate failure and a tear drop to indicate awe-inspiring success? :)
- References:
- [tlug] l10n and icons: good example?
- From: Christian Horn
- Re: [tlug] l10n and icons: good example?
- From: Travis Cardwell
- Re: [tlug] l10n and icons: good example?
- From: Benjamin Tayehanpour
- Re: [tlug] l10n and icons: good example?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] l10n and icons: good example?
- From: Christian Horn
- Re: [tlug] l10n and icons: good example?
- From: Benjamin Tayehanpour
- Re: [tlug] l10n and icons: good example?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] l10n and icons: good example?
- Next by Date: [tlug] Last week Mac, this week Linux
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] l10n and icons: good example?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] l10n and icons: good example?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links