Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Help with Mint
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:18:24 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Help with Mint
- References: <558BFE24.6020302@hb.tp1.jp> <87mvznwdez.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <558D1977.6020203@hb.tp1.jp> <87h9psw2wl.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <558FE344.2060201@hb.tp1.jp>
Thomas Blasejewicz writes: > Well, when I bought the new computer with Windows 8.1 I suddenly > found, that the OS accesses the Win 7 notebook I have and even my > daughter's PC - without my permission. You're observant. Many people don't realize that's an issue. > I am now running my PC with this offline account and deleted the > online one. But the same thing will happen with any Windows system you bring into your network, or that's on a network they join. > That is why (as I wrote earlier, for years now) I thought, Linux might > give me an alternative (and more freedom?). Alternative, yes, freedom, yes, "free", no. :-) > Do I understand you correctly, when I interpret your advice as "stick to > Windows"? Not yet. It's certainly an obvious option given the preference of your clients. "The customer is always right," you know. :-/ > (for one: I cannot afford to buy me another new computer; and > buying a Windows upgrade for 3-400 USD is not very appealing > either) Do Windows upgrades really cost that much? (University employee, site license, nobody talks about prices where I work.) The reason I ask is that it occurred to me is it occurred to me that you could switch the older XP box to Linux (which can be configured to run more lightly than even Windows XP, at some cost of your existing "muscle memory"), and installing Windows on the new one. But at that price it's quite ridiculous. In fact, you have plenty of computers. I suppose you have operating- system sized pieces of disk free on several of them. You asked before about single-partition installs vs. multi-partition installs. I see no reason for a personal workstation to use a multi-partition install. The main advantage to a multi-partition install with modern file systems is that you automatically get protection against things like having log files overflow the disk and being unable to save a couple megabytes of work. But you shouldn't have huge rapidly growing log files, and from what you said, it sounds like at any time you have at most a few kilobytes unsaved. What you do need partitions for is installing multiple operating systems in a multiboot configuration, including making bootable copies of /boot as Christian mentioned in the context of backups. Of course additional physical drives would do as well, if you're more comfortable opening the case and plugging in three connectors (each end of the data cable plus the drive side of the power cable) than repartitioning existing drives. And those cost less than $50/TB last I looked. Anyway, you need not pay much attention to any of the above at this time. The point is that Linux (or other free OS) does give you a lot of cheap options. You just need to figure out which is best for you, then compare that one with sticking to Windows for work.
- References:
- [tlug] Help with Mint
- From: Thomas Blasejewicz
- [tlug] Help with Mint
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Help with Mint
- From: Thomas Blasejewicz
- Re: [tlug] Help with Mint
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Help with Mint
- From: Thomas Blasejewicz
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Self-introduction
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Self-introduction
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Help with Mint
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Help with Mint
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links