Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Um, so... systemd?
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 03:15:42 -0500
- From: Scott Robbins <scottro@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Um, so... systemd?
- References: <1484466028.1128194.848109712.20A4C328@webmail.messagingengine.com> <d4bcb8a1-a9a1-781f-3c36-fbc3ba4ee2a0@dcook.org> <7e953f7b-a75e-26e4-72a5-709d1936c4f9@cisco.com> <CA+su7OX0vrfABNcjFoAqhF84LKUAbcnNp2RXefAYjdDWKg26Mg@mail.gmail.com> <20170119032626.GC9340@quadratic.cynic.net> <20170119105549.GA26563@scott1.scottro.net> <20170120073604.GA5858@quadratic.cynic.net>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 04:36:04PM +0900, Curt Sampson wrote: > On 2017-01-19 05:55 -0500 (Thu), Scott Robbins wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:26:26PM +0900, Curt Sampson wrote: > > > On 2017-01-19 11:45 +0900 (Thu), Edmund Edgar wrote: > > > > > > > I fixed this by sprinkling "NM_CONTROLLED=no" liberally around the > > > > interface definitions. To be on the safe side I guess I should disable > > > > the network manager service entirely, and maybe get somebody in to do > > > > an exorcism. > > > > > > The incantation I use for that is `sudo yum remove NetworkManager`. > > > > > I don't bother to remove [NetworkManager], because various updates > > reinstall it. > > Really? That sounds rather odd, since nothing normally run on a server > should have a dependency on it. (I'd image that some of the graphical > network management tools typically installed on desktop systems might, > though.) Do you have more details on when you've seen this happen? This is a server-cum-desktop and as I'm looking, I see I'm mistaken. Thak you. What I do have though is NetworkManager-libnm. > > > (And it is necessary, as Edmund mentioned to add the > > NM_CONTROLLED=no to the ifcfg-whatever entries.) > > Actually, that's necessary only if you actually run NetworkManager. > The tests that look at it are of the form > > if is_nm_running ... > if ! is_false $NM_CONTROLLED; then I would definitely take your word over mine. :) I guess I've been doing it for so long that it's become habit. Thank you, you corrected two bits of incorrect knowledge on my part. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Um, so... systemd?
- From: Curt Sampson
- References:
- [tlug] Um, so... systemd?
- From: David J Iannucci
- Re: [tlug] Um, so... systemd?
- From: Darren Cook
- Re: [tlug] Um, so... systemd?
- From: dblomber
- Re: [tlug] Um, so... systemd?
- From: Edmund Edgar
- Re: [tlug] Um, so... systemd?
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Um, so... systemd?
- From: Scott Robbins
- Re: [tlug] Um, so... systemd?
- From: Curt Sampson
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Um, so... systemd?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Um, so... systemd?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Um, so... systemd?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Um, so... systemd?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links