Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 22:41:06 +0900
- From: kts <kts@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- References: <E6EC4B7C-BF2D-499F-A5E9-3CD5E2E65E00@me.scn-net.ne.jp> <CAFNLySvf8JPLpBTzwTgs8GfdceKzXA8rvKRuYxkYXy3je9AP-Q@mail.gmail.com> <535159B7-694F-45FB-82CA-458E64F7F941@me.scn-net.ne.jp> <CAFNLySv7FbBcrkWpkNqzahtFn9VqSeDJZ8NLRJKvSY9boj+Ykw@mail.gmail.com> <228270D2-E015-4D48-BC55-2035954E6278@me.scn-net.ne.jp> <CAFNLySsJui41vxfTQEvHmEH_GrKWyM1AdFVG1zQqEjo3X02xzw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFNLySv0eeEjGx8SQxkqzmooZVO0gnJy0gmrgsdJ3v5E9es1Zw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFNLySsD9WNS8=c20WbRq5hYy83v0HWkjUarKuc96GwP2=XE8g@mail.gmail.com> <CAFNLySsLi1Zm9BM6bfgyM5K8RfY7joJ6VViyAQhyQN1RvN_tLA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFNLySsya_8rUurAgqn5vVxbtXOt548uAb6=ZqFGFWXShQbr=g@mail.gmail.com> <8393017C-1141-41C4-8E20-0F2A53C013F1@me.scn-net.ne.jp> <642e1275-ab84-081e-5421-a50cb785663f@free.fr> <B9734D1A-A3B6-4161-9732-7362C934AA56@me.scn-net.ne.jp> <3A09E790-A00B-4B51-9143-3B54C49D6687@me.scn-net.ne.jp> <CAKXLc7e3fGq97+W+kM+c3r3R=QTMBA0+dH8m0=_Ck2b9tjckDg@mail.gmail.com>
On Jun 25, 2017, at 06:17, Kalin KOZHUHAROV <me.kalin@example.com> wrote:On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 3:07 AM, kts <kts@example.com> wrote:It is interesting that my first response to computer issues is usually:I really doubt that statement.
BUY MORE HARDWARE
when the solution can often be found in software settings…. that maxcpus=x
line of 9 characters possibly saved me a few ¥10,000 bills…
Please check with a power meter when you leave use normally your
machine over the course of few days with maxcpus=x and without.
I was happy with https://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/B01DX4JNXE , now a
useless paperweight in Germany (only 100V supported).
If your machine is idle, the CPU is really just a few watts.
Kalin.#Warning: This discussion is moving non-linux-related for the time-impaired...Ok. A quick check here suggest "system idle load" for the 1090t chip to be 122watts idle, 201watts full load. This is a 2010-era 45nm hex-core chip with a TDP of 125w. Video card is a base level passive cooling type.If the difference is about 80watts and we say it is all CPU under load, then the idle usage 125TDP-80=~45wThe I7 4790K “@22nm and 4.0ghz with 4 cores, TDP of 88w.Assume the system load is maybe another 70watts or so?Anyway, the Intel machine also has a penalty of mongo video card pulling full-bore 225w if I let those Nvidia processors rip.More than likely I should shut down the WinTel 4790K except when using it rather than idling. I tend to do more daily use on the MacBookanyway.Newer low-power Intel chips @22nm have a TDP of 35w, significantly better than my old space heater…at the price of new CPU, motherboard, and full complement of memory… my hardware itch.. ;)balanced against my loathing to scrap a fully functioning 6-core with expensive CPU cooler and maxed 16gb RAM to sell for peanuts at the second-hand shops.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- From: Stephen Lee
- References:
- [tlug] silicon cash eater
- From: kts
- Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- From: AbH Belxjander Draconis Serechai
- Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- From: kts
- Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- From: AbH Belxjander Draconis Serechai
- Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- From: kts
- Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- From: AbH Belxjander Draconis Serechai
- Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- From: kts
- Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- From: Francois Cartegnie
- Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- From: kts
- Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- From: kts
- Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- From: Kalin KOZHUHAROV
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links