Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Journals, Authors and 'Free Peer Review'
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 02:55:56 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull.stephen.fw@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Journals, Authors and 'Free Peer Review'
- References: <2c477cca-5f27-a7e0-7947-c050828c56a3@dcook.org> <23459.16741.365151.303089@turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <55e2bb2c-f9ce-4ee9-beb3-c60882d35150@dcook.org> <ce9454fb-8ad7-ded3-76ec-41cc1ac6f413@gmail.com> <20180925090623.GA2941@priv.dyadic.cynic.net> <CADR0rndonq88pf-hGTrzU88yNXYOww-t8pVGaBvcc2EgLC86fQ@mail.gmail.com> <5449dd1f-c5de-b2fe-9cdc-28d38866b612@gmail.com>
Raymond Wan writes: > It does open a can of worms that few people want to address. > For example, if I submit a manuscript to a journal, am I > obligated to cite earlier work that was submitted to ArXiv, > knowing that it hasn't yet been through the process of peer > review? I am? If so, then should I cite someone who said > they did a preliminary study but reported it on their > homepage or their blog? Where does one draw the line? I don't see the problem. If you mention the results in your work, you cite it, even if it's the writing on the ass of Marilyn in the nude on the patent leather jacket of the skinny little boy from Cleveland Ohio. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhj7rthZM1s @ 2:00 > If I'm reviewing for aforementioned journal and I came > across this earlier work in ArXiv, do I point out or > criticize the author for not citing this work in ArXiv? Point it out if the quality justifies it. "Criticize" depends on how hard you had to work to find it. If it's any good, Googling the current author's keywords on Scholar better not bring it up on the first page of results, is all I'll say. > I was doing a literature search for something I'm working on and > found something in ArXiv that was posted about 2 years ago but > never got published finally...do I cite it? If you mention its results. Really, how hard is this? The only people who have a problem are those writing a *comprehensive* literature review. There, I guess you mention and cite unless it's really garbage. > I'm a small potato and my workplace gives credit to publication in > journals and not ArXiv...so that's what I'll do. ;-( Don't they give any weight to citations? Exposing your work to more people can't hurt in terms of getting your name known to reviewers, too. I don't see the problem with the strategy Benjamin suggests (as long as the journals in question don't refuse submissions of work directly descended from ArXiv publications).
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Journals, Authors and 'Free Peer Review'
- From: Raymond Wan
- References:
- [tlug] Timed licenses? (and eschrow/smart contracts)
- From: Darren Cook
- [tlug] Timed licenses? (and eschrow/smart contracts)
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Timed licenses? (and escrow/smart contracts)
- From: Darren Cook
- Re: [tlug] Timed licenses? (and escrow/smart contracts)
- From: Raymond Wan
- [tlug] Journals, Authors and 'Free Peer Review'
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Journals, Authors and 'Free Peer Review'
- From: Benjamin Kowarsch
- Re: [tlug] Journals, Authors and 'Free Peer Review'
- From: Raymond Wan
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] Journals, Authors and 'Free Peer Review'
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Journals, Authors and 'Free Peer Review'
- Previous by thread: [tlug] [Suspected Spam]Re: Journals, Authors and 'Free Peer Review'
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Journals, Authors and 'Free Peer Review'
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links