Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: IDE CD-ROMs
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: IDE CD-ROMs
- From: jwt@example.com (Jim Tittsler)
- Date: Tue, 03 Oct 1995 12:21:00 +0900
- Newsgroups: list.tlug
- Organization: 7J1AJH/AI8A Tokyo
- References: <Pine.HPP.3.91.951003105928.1392B-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Gee. More reaction than I had expected. >The Slacware setup program had options for 3 IDE CD-ROMs, 2 Sony, and a >Mitsumi, none worked with my Reveal (NEC) cd-rom, Are you sure you aren't confusing IDE (ATAPI) and proprietary interfaces? The standard IDE driver in Linux supports ATAPI CD-ROM drives (based on conditional compilation). I have installed Slackware from ATAPI drives. (Make sure you have a recent MAKEDEV in your /dev directory. Some early Slackware distributions had the wrong device numbers for the secondary IDE ports (drives hdc and hdd). This is explained in the IDE README in /usr/src/linux/drivers/block) ATAPI CD-ROM drives are available from NEC, Sony, Chinon, Creative Technology, Wearnes, Aztech, MKE, Mitsumi, and doubtlessly others. >have you ever looked into the IDE EIDE ATAPI mess? Sure. I am part of the standards process, so I've examined it in fair detail. But I've also designed a SCSI CD-ROM. Both have warts. >Linux content: If SCSI is "definitely out-dated" why are the Linux mailing >lists and FAQ's overloaded with SCSI questions? Because as Steve pointed out, people don't implement it in a consistent way? :-) > Is Linux using "out-dated" technology? Yes, as the famous exchange between Linus and Tannebaum (sp?) explained. :-) Jim
- References:
- Re: IDE CD-ROMs
- From: Craig Oda <craig@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: IDE CD-ROMs
- Next by Date: Re: IDE CD-ROMs
- Prev by thread: Re: IDE CD-ROMs
- Next by thread: re: IDE CD-ROMs
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links