Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]re: Linux vs BSD
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: re: Linux vs BSD
- From: TMatsumu@example.com
- Date: 15 Nov 95 13:39:00 EST
- In-Reply-To: <Pine .A32.3.91.951114193644.57300A-100000@example.com>
- References: <Pine .A32.3.91.951114193644.57300A-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
I asked a friend of mine, Mike Durkin about this about 6 months ago. There were some specific reasons why he uses BSD, and maybe he can repeat them here. I'm curious to know if BSD bogs down under load like Linux does, are tcp sockets or buffer sizes smaller or less configurable under Linux? Ted ***** Ted Matsumura, Adaptec Japan Ltd. ATM Program Manager, InterNetworking Technology (INTO) phone: 03-5276-8433, Fax (03) 5276-9364 email: tmatsumu@example.com http://www.rahul.net/tedm ***** ------------- Original Text >From owner-tlug@example.com, on 11/14/95 7:37 PM: Hello Everyone!! I have been using Linux for about six monts now and I'm happy with it. The thing is some people aske me why don't I use bsd but I don't know why I should. They always tell me that bsd is better but never give me a reason for it. It's the same right? Does anyone know the different? Thank you in advance for debugging my confusion. /se
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux vs BSD
- Next by Date: Re: Linux vs BSD
- Prev by thread: Re: Linux vs BSD
- Next by thread: Japanese man pages
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links