Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]re: Windows 95
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: re: Windows 95
- From: TMatsumu@example.com
- Date: 03 Jan 96 14:37:00 EST
- In-Reply-To: <m0tVvbJ-0004RBC@example.com>
- References: <m0tVvbJ-0004RBC@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Steve, Are you talking about win95 support in Japan, or RoW? Certainly Japan has some unique issues with hyped software. For example, I don't know that other countries get flooded with support calls about a round silver platter not fitting into the Nintendo... Other than the above Win95 is a technical and financial success. I've been installing and using Win95 for almost two years, and I'd be happy to compare my installation war stories of Linux with Win95 at our next tabehoudai. Ted ------------- Original Text >From owner-tlug@example.com, on 12-30-95 4:21 PM: >>>>> "Yuri" == cybernet <cybernet@example.com> writes: Yuri> January 28, sounds fine, I will be back in Japan. See you Yuri> guys. to Craig: Windows 95 should not be a problem, I did Yuri> the instalation many times and was suprised that inspite of On how many different kinds of hardware? Windows 95 works great on some hardware, not at all on others, as you would expect. The problem hardware was moderately rare, the complete failures almost none. Microsoft's Win95 help lines were still overwhelmed by calls from about 1 in 20 purchasers within the first 24 hours; it's not known how many never did get through, as waiting times during that first day were sometimes 45-120 minutes depending on which service you were switched to. DEC was one of the subcontractors handling those help lines (MS didn't man any of the first line of defense; they only handled real problem cases). Apparently DEC had a lot of hollow laughs over the "success" of Win95 - that is, the success in luring in lots of people who thought it would be the answer to all their installation problems. ("Hollow" because it doesn't matter how good or bad MS software is any more, the lemmings will follow. DEC never had it that good.) I don't know about Windows 95, but my experience with MS OS's is that they don't like to share disk space. If you're installing to a virgin disk, or over another MS OS, to the first primary partition, no problem. If you want to install the MS OS after another one in a separate partition, you sometimes get hosed. OS/2's bootloader is even more famous for this. Steve
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: I'd like to know what hardware is the best for Linux and Windows 95
- Next by Date: Next Meeting
- Prev by thread: Linux experience and jobs, was [Re: Developing Games under Linux]
- Next by thread: Next Meeting
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links