Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [berman@example.com: LINUX on Alpha info]
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: [berman@example.com: LINUX on Alpha info]
- From: TMatsumu@example.com
- Date: 25 Mar 96 20:22:00 EST
- In-Reply-To: <m0u14ge-00mMNlC@example.com>
- Priority: Urgent
- References: <m0u14ge-00mMNlC@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Form: Reply Header: Adaptec Text: (15 lines follow) re: > Certainly it will do everything more quickly, This is certainly not true. Any new 64 bit processor will need applications specifically written for 64 bits, not just recompiled for it, and will also need a 64 bit bus. Right now, the PCI bus on the Alpha is 32 bits. NT disk i/o is fairly advanced, I haven't seen anything with Linux that touches the built in mirroring and striping w/parity and w/out parity on a dual channel PCI host adapter. Original text: (50 lines follow) >From owner-tlug@example.com, on 3/25/96 2:19 PM: To: tlug@example.com Cc: tlug@example.com >>>>> Darren Cook <darren@example.com> writes: >enterprise environment. Digital makes the Alpha processor which >is the world's fastest single-chip microprocessor and which >currently supports three 64-bit operating systems (Digital UNIX, >OpenVMS and Linux) as well as Windows NT. I wonder if the same system would give better performance under Linux (64bit) or Windows NT (32 bit)? Surely under Linux. :-) I'm not terribly impressed with Windows NT's speed, but I've never used it with its native NTFS, nor in serious applications. The cards bounce slower when you win Solitaire.... :-) Does 64 bit only give an advantage in certain types of applications, or does it do everything more quickly? Does a program just need to be recompiled, or would it need some rewriting? Depends on the rest of your hardware. Presumably using the whole bus for file and video transfers speeds everything up, for example. But I would imagine that drivers for NT for Alpha do use the whole bus, it's the internals of the OS that remain 32 bits. Certainly it will do everything more quickly, but you won't notice it on your wordprocessor. There you're better spending money on RAM, video, and hardware cache on your HDD adapter. If you recompile the kernel a lot (Craig, how often *do* you recompile the kernel? It takes me 20 minutes, but I can always find *work* to do in the slack time) you'll notice, if you use large nonlinear maths, you'll notice. Most programs will just need to be recompiled. Programs that worry about endianness, byte size, word size, and so on (bitmap graphics, large numerical packages) will need to be tuned. But programs like that which are available on the net for GCC will surely have their hardware dependencies conditioned on a -DCOMPILE_FOR_DEC_ALPHA #define. You're more likely to run into misconfigurations for Linux (the Smail maintainers have been complaining about this for years). -- Stephen J. Turnbull Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Yaseppochi-Gumi University of Tsukuba http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp/ Tennodai 1-1-1, Tsukuba, 305 JAPAN turnbull@example.com Use Proportional Font: true Previous From: owner-tlug@example.com Previous To: tlug@example.com Previous Cc: tlug@example.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [berman@example.com: LINUX on Alpha info]
- From: turnbull@example.com (Stephen J. Turnbull)
- References:
- Re: [berman@example.com: LINUX on Alpha info]
- From: turnbull@example.com (Stephen J. Turnbull)
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [berman@example.com: LINUX on Alpha info]
- Next by Date: Re: [berman@example.com: LINUX on Alpha info]
- Prev by thread: Re: [berman@example.com: LINUX on Alpha info]
- Next by thread: Re: [berman@example.com: LINUX on Alpha info]
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links