Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Old 386s, Solaris x86, SCO, NT
- To: "Tokyo Linux Abuser's Group" <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: Old 386s, Solaris x86, SCO, NT
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1996 12:11:26 +0900
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 18 Dec 1996 06:47:47 +0900." <199612172147.GAA21576@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug
>>>>> "John" == John Little <gaijin@example.com> writes: >> I really can't tell the difference, What I had in mind here was at the user level or daily sysadmin level. Once you get into system configuration and programming, things are going to change. But I don't have access to the sysadmin functions or directories on anything except my own Linux systems (and _everybody's_ DOS, Mac, and Windows 3.1/95 systems, of course :-P). >> So, what _is_ the difference? John> However, specific to printing, Solaris uses the dreaded John> lpNet and lpsched rather than BSD's lpd. Is this a change from SunOS? SunOS Release 4.1.3-JLE1.1.3 (SHAKO1) #4: Fri Jul 9 14:31:35 JST 1993 ***** おしらせ ***** shako1:~ => ps -aux | grep lpd root 213 0.0 0.0 52 0 ? IW Dec 14 0:00 /usr/lib/lpd turnbull 15360 0.0 0.1 28 232 pb S 12:04 0:00 grep lpd shako1:~ => John> Having more than a trivial number of printers to handle John> (here at work we have hundreds) causes the SVR4 printer John> processes to go out to (a long) lunch. Different commands John> use different options to specify standard arguments (now John> let's see, is it "-p", "-P" or "-d" to specify the John> printer?). Yuk! This is admittedly ridiculous. The only reason to love Xt is that all of the usual switches are built in standard. Is it really that hard to change the printing system interface? (Obviously if you're managing "hundreds of printers," it's an administrative nightmare, at least until you install a package management system and create a new package, and even then it's a substantial cost. But does the OS put up obstacles to changing on a single machine? The "shako" system described above only has about two dozen printers in printcap, half of them relics of a time when professors couldn't afford workstations so used X terminals and printers in their offices.) Steve -- Stephen J. Turnbull Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Yaseppochi-Gumi University of Tsukuba http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp/ Tel: +81 (298) 53-5091; Fax: 55-3849 turnbull@example.com ----------------------------------------------------------------- a word from the sponsor will appear below ----------------------------------------------------------------- The TLUG mailing list is proudly sponsored by TWICS - Japan's First Public-Access Internet System. Now offering 20,000 yen/year flat rate Internet access with no time charges. Full line of corporate Internet and intranet products are available. info@example.com Tel: 03-3351-5977 Fax: 03-3353-6096
- References:
- Re: Old 386s, Solaris x86, SCO, NT
- From: gaijin@example.com (John Little)
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Old 386s, Solaris x86, SCO, NT
- Next by Date: Re: Restart problems
- Prev by thread: Re: Old 386s, Solaris x86, SCO, NT
- Next by thread: Re: Old 386s, Solaris x86, SCO, NT
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links