Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Debian 1.2 / Mule input
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Debian 1.2 / Mule input
- From: Craig Oda <craig@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 16:33:22 +0900
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug
I figured out how to input katakana more effectively using the meta-k key combination while in the fence mode. I can also input the JIS code for special characters. However, I can only input the hex conversion now. This is not that pressing of a problem since the main character I needed was the ten ・瘢雹. Quotes would be nice though. I've done the Debian 1.2 installation. It went much more smoothly than my last Debian pre-1.0 install. I installed it on a laptop from behind a firewall. I made six install floppies from another machine. The install went smoothly except for the networking section. I had to ftp the pcmcia section manually and write my own network configuration scripts in order to use Debian's dselect utility. Also, the dselect utility is not that easy to use. I do prefer the text interface to RedHat's control panel. Debian downloads all the packages to the local hard disk before beginning the install process. This is more reliable than the redhat approach of downloading the packages one by one. However, it does mean that more hard disk space is needed. I also found the interface fairly hard to understand. I've also had problems with installing more programs than I wanted to on RedHat. Debian appeared to offer a bit more control, or at least it is a bit easier to pick which packages to install. Though, I guess this is personal preference. The uninstall function of Debian is nice. Also, installing from a Windows '95 partition is easier since Debian did not have any problems with the mangled filenames. I seem to remember RedHat choking on the DOS filenames. There is also a Japanese Debian project which I hope to look into after I get more familiar with Debian. Another thing that Debian had that I don't think RedHat had was a package listing that described each file. This is a seperate text file. I just loaded the file into jed and searched through it until I found what I needed. Once I got the ethernet working on the laptop, I used the dselect interface to load just the packages that I needed. I guess the main difference I see between Debian and RedHat is that RedHat is easier to install a whole lot of Linux programs. However, Debian is more modular and while the install is text based without the fancy glint stuff, I found it easier to use. I can understand how many people would prefer the RedHat installation method though. Since I'm using a laptop with minimal space and RAM, I'm not sure that I want to even install X on it. Debian allowed me to install a working system from just 6 floppy disks and build up a custom system piece by piece. In fact, I'm still building it.. -- Craig ----------------------------------------------------------------- a word from the sponsor will appear below ----------------------------------------------------------------- The TLUG mailing list is proudly sponsored by TWICS - Japan's First Public-Access Internet System. Now offering 20,000 yen/year flat rate Internet access with no time charges. Full line of corporate Internet and intranet products are available. info@example.com Tel: 03-3351-5977 Fax: 03-3353-6096
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: New-year-gift
- Next by Date: Re: Debian/Laptops n'stuff
- Prev by thread: New-year-gift
- Next by thread: Re: Debian/Laptops n'stuff
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links