Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]tlug: PPP&RH5.0 (was: Infoworld Review)
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: tlug: PPP&RH5.0 (was: Infoworld Review)
- From: "A.Tomita,Jr." <alberto@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 1998 00:44:13 +0900
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
- In-Reply-To: <m0xzfHK-00014KC@example.com>
- References: <199802030814.RAA04310@example.com><Pine.LNX.3.96.980203082950.24460A-100000@example.com><199802030814.RAA04310@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
At 19:08 98/02/03 +0900, you wrote: > This is not as interesting as `route -n'. (If the DNS is likely to > get screwy, you need that `-n'.) In particular, I'd like to know what > the `metric' column says. It says: Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 165.76.88.27 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 4 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 3 lo 0.0.0.0 165.76.88.27 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 1 ppp0 > WTF is that 192.168.****100****.1?!!? I hope it's a typo. It was an attempt to see if the error could be related to the IP address assigned to the interface. It wasn't, as the problem persists. > What does your ifconfig say about your interfaces? Do you have ip > forwarding, firewalling, and/or bridging enabled? See what `ipfwadm > -{F,I,O} -l' has to say. Output from ifconfig: lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1 RX packets:20574 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 TX packets:20574 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:80:AD:B4:39:A7 inet addr:192.168.1.1 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:826 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 TX packets:468 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 Interrupt:9 Base address:0x300 ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol inet addr:165.76.88.176 P-t-P:165.76.88.27 Mask:255.255.0.0 UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING MTU:1524 Metric:1 RX packets:11 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 TX packets:11 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 IP forwarding is enabled. I also tried enablig firewalling/ip_masquerading, setting the policy: /sbin/ipfwadm -F -p deny /sbin/ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0 -W ppp0 On this policy, I got a hint from the IP masquerade mailing list that removing -W ppp0 could work. It didn't. --- A.Tomita,Jr. atomita@example.com atomita@example.com --------------------------------------------------------------- Next Saturday Meeting: 14 February 1998 12:30 Tokyo Station Yaesu Chuo ticket gate. --------------------------------------------------------------- a word from the sponsor: TWICS - Japan's First Public-Access Internet System www.twics.com info@example.com Tel:03-3351-5977 Fax:03-3353-6096
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: PPP&RH5.0 (was: Infoworld Review)
- From: "A.Tomita,Jr." <alberto@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: Infoworld Review
- From: "A.Tomita,Jr." <Alberto@example.com>
- tlug: Infoworld Review
- From: joem <joem@example.com>
- Re: tlug: Infoworld Review
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: Re: PPP&RH5.0 (was: Infoworld Review)
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: PPP&RH5.0 (was: Infoworld Review)
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: Infoworld Review
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: PPP&RH5.0 (was: Infoworld Review)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links