Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]tlug: was email software --> UNICODE input
- To: "'tlug@example.com'" <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: tlug: was email software --> UNICODE input
- From: "Olinsky, Craig" <olinskyc@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 01:20:56 -0700
- Content-Type: text/plain
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
> That will take development of a lot of auxiliary tools, though; with > all the resources of Microsoft etc behind it, Unicode is just now > getting decent fonts. So users will be dependent on existing fonts, > and you'll have to build smart tools to handle multi-byte fonts. As > far as I know, there really isn't a good input method for Unicode (as > a multi-lingual system---of course for any given national language you > can use a localized version with table-driven conversion). > > This is something I've wondered about a bit, so I'd be interested in hearing the opinions of others on the list (although not explicitly Linux related, so feel free to cut me off at any time). What would constitute a "Unicode Input Method" -- as opposed to a collection of separate input methods by language/script? Obviously, you'd want the ability to do raw-hex input, although this wouldn't be as much value to endusers. You could also put up a char-chart (by language/script/or code point) and have the user click, but that wouldn't be an efficient way to type either. Handwriting recognition would be an interesting (but difficult) possibility. I supposed the only possibility of "unifying" input would have to be by the physical appearance of the glpyh -- since anything pronunciation-based would be language-specific, and require a certain language base for every language used. Plus there's a number of non-pronounceable characters. Of course, there are many glyphs with alternate forms, and others with similiar appearances, so there couldn't be anything close to a one-to-one correspondance. Does anyone have any good ideas? Or is the localized approach the ideal, and the idea of a common input method simply counterproductive? Thanks, Craig -- not speaking for intel --------------------------------------------------------------- Next TLUG Meeting: 11 April Sat, Tokyo Station Yaesu gate 12:30 Featuring Tague Griffith of Netscape i18n talking on source code --------------------------------------------------------------- a word from the sponsor: TWICS - Japan's First Public-Access Internet System www.twics.com info@example.com Tel:03-3351-5977 Fax:03-3353-6096
- Follow-Ups:
- tlug: was email software --> UNICODE input
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: tlug: was email software --> UNICODE input
- From: "J. David Beutel" <jdb@example.com>
- Re: tlug: was email software --> UNICODE input
- From: Jon Babcock <jon@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: recommendable email software]
- Next by Date: tlug: TurboLinux 1.9beta-1 TOMORROW!!!
- Prev by thread: tlug: XML FAQ
- Next by thread: tlug: was email software --> UNICODE input
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links