Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]RE: tlug: FW: Windows 95
- To: <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: RE: tlug: FW: Windows 95
- From: "Jonathan Byrne--3Web" <jq@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 10:12:09 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-2022-jp"
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>I've resisted forwarding this for a month and a half, but can't resist >any longer... > >> For those of you who love Microsoft... I think I first saw this about a year and a half ago :-) >> that can't stand 1 bit of competition. Funny thing is, standing competition is what Microsoft does better than anything else. Remember that they were once a very small company, but they got big through a combination of being in the right place at the right time, and through being very, very good at competition. And of course, they also do make a lot of very nice products that I wish they'd port to Linux :-) There's a new book out about Microsoft, sort of a tell-all one, I gather. It's written by the son of one of Bill Gates' close marketing advisors. He's a programmer who did some of the earliest work on Windows, and various other things at MS. There is one anecdote, cited in the book review I saw that you'll enjoy: One day when the author was working on some on-screen clock program for Windows way back when (this was probably the original Windows), he was using a Microsoft Basic product and trying to do a flood-fill operation to put color in the background, but it wasn't working. Finally, he gave up and wrote a new flood-fill algorithm and patched it in, then got the background done. Later that day when Bill Gates stopped in, he described the problem and how he solved it and showed Gates the algorithm, with the rhetorical comment about the original one that "Who wrote this brain-dead piece of shit, anyway?" Gates said that the algorithm was nice and went on his way. After Gates was gone, someone mentioned that in fact it was Bill Gates who had written the original :-) >with a little creativity I could probably shoehorn a 64-bit Alpha/NT >system in there I'd rather shoehorn one of those into my house :-) Here's a little piece of NT trivia passed on to me by a UNIX software engineer I know: according to him, NT isn't really very much of a Microsoft product. All the important parts, including the marvelous NT file system, were written by hired guns from DEC, the same ones who designed VAX VMS. Apparently, about all Microsoft put in was the GUI and the Win32 API. And they took out some goodies the DEC people wanted in, such as support for OS/2's HPFS. Has anyone else heard this? Cheers, Jonathan -------------------------------------------------------------- Next TLUG Meeting: 13 June Sat, Tokyo Station Yaesu gate 12:30 Featuring Stone and Turnbull on .rpm and .deb packages Next Nomikai: (?) July, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 -------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: tlug: FW: Windows 95
- From: Felix Morley Finch <felix@example.com>
- Re: tlug: FW: Windows 95
- From: i16@example.com (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCTlMhITAmMGxPOhsoQg==?=)
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: tlug: Spam Contest Announcement
- Next by Date: RE: tlug: RedHat 5.1
- Prev by thread: tlug: FW: Windows 95
- Next by thread: RE: tlug: FW: Windows 95
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links