Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: Re: Perens on New Distribution
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: Re: Perens on New Distribution
- From: craigoda@example.com
- Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 11:34:13 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 27 May 1998 10:40:18 +0900"<199805270140.KAA00131@example.com>
- References: <199805270140.KAA00131@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
From: "Totoro" <riley@example.com> Subject: tlug: Re: Perens on New Distribution Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 10:40:18 +0900 riley> >riley> that Bruce Perens is talking about creating a new Linux distribution... riley> > riley> >Do you know what the issues were? Even if he doesn't do this, I would riley> >be interested in hearing the good and bad points. Did this have to riley> >do with the file structure? riley> riley> The Linux Weekly News is at http://lwn.net/ riley> riley> Of course, now the article is archived, as the item was in the riley> May 7 edition. Anyhow, it references some traffic on usenet David, thanks. I got the link now. It is http://lwn.net/980507/perensnewlinux.html and this is the relevant section IMHO. I propose for this system binary, _dependency_, and package compatibility with Red Hat, the most popular Linux distribution that has made it to LIBC 6. This would guarantee the availability of commercial applications for the system. Obviously, the easiest way to do that is to derive from Red Hat. More: RPM as the package system - possibly with an APT port later on (is that what it's called now?). It's necessary to get the other distributions in on the project. We'd have to add a few missing features to RPM, but this would be pretty easy to do. COAS as a system management framework. Non-interactive install. Limited set of interpreters for system tasks and pre-install and post-install scripts. How about ANSI shell (_not_ necessarily Bourne shell), Python, and everything else is a compiled executable? I'm concerned that Perl is a rather messy language compared to Python, and both Red Hat and Caldera seem to be focusing on Python. Okay. He didn't say that he was going to make the new distribution. My opinion is that rpm and dpkg are pretty similar, so that's not a big problem even if it goes this way. However, it appears that Debian is still going strong right now and there is no indication that this would change. I like Python better than Perl, so this is fine with me. What is APT??? Regards, Craig ---- Craig Oda craigoda@example.com http://tlug.linux.or.jp/~craigoda -------------------------------------------------------------- Next TLUG Meeting: 13 June Sat, Tokyo Station Yaesu gate 12:30 Featuring Stone and Turnbull on .rpm and .deb packages Next Nomikai: (?) July, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 -------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- References:
- tlug: Re: Perens on New Distribution
- From: "Totoro" <riley@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: Spam Contest Announcement
- Next by Date: tlug: Linux Usage in Japan Survey Results Available
- Prev by thread: tlug: Re: Perens on New Distribution
- Next by thread: tlug: Linux Usage in Japan Survey Results Available
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links