Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: FreeBSD News issue 2
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: FreeBSD News issue 2
- From: Rex Walters <rex@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 12:01:27 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <13673.35029.795039.240702@example.com>; from Stephen J. Turnbull on Tue, May 26, 1998 at 12:05:57AM +0900
- Mail-Followup-To: tlug@example.com
- References: <034501bd8798$7e91b920$18d8ebca@example.com> <13673.35029.795039.240702@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
I'm up to my neck in real work, but I can't help posting to this thread. The free market (free-for-all) bazaar style, multi-distribution, Linux way of things has definitely "won" in terms of number of installations, radical new development, etc., etc. But I'm not alone in finding the formal code review and cathedral-ish aspects of OpenBSD (not FreeBSD) also quite appealing. The Berkeley fileysystem (the data structure, not the hierarchy naming conventions) is also arguably more reliable or at least better understood than ext2fs. [Not my argument: this flame-fest is all over the advocacy news groups, qmail mailing lists, etc. Me, I'm *perfectly* happy with ext2fs stability and depend on it daily for *work* not personal use. In a nutshell: no code I'm aware of actually fsync's directories as required for absolute crash-proof atomicity for transaction oriented programming with ext2fs -- most code expects Berkely FFS (UFS) semantics.] The "net-net" (I use the phrase out of sheer perversity -- I despise this particular abuse of English beyond all others) is that I use and depend on Linux for everything I do today, but if I were to put up a huge, popular, heavy load, single-task server of some sort on the internet tomorrow, I would take a long hard look at OpenBSD. My feelings on the topic are somewhat voltairesque: I mourn the death of any Linux distribution or *BSD distribution. The computer world in general, and the Linux world in particular, is a better place with the *BSD distributions and advocates still around. If nothing else it keeps us Linux folks on our toes. Regards, -- Rex P.S. http://www.openbsd.org/ is worth a gander. -------------------------------------------------------------- Next TLUG Meeting: 13 June Sat, Tokyo Station Yaesu gate 12:30 Featuring Stone and Turnbull on .rpm and .deb packages Next Nomikai: (?) July, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 -------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- References:
- Re: tlug: FreeBSD News issue 2
- From: "Jonathan Byrne" <jpmag@example.com>
- Re: tlug: FreeBSD News issue 2
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: tlug: Linux Usage in Japan Survey Results Available
- Next by Date: RE: tlug: FW: Windows 95
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: FreeBSD News issue 2
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: FreeBSD News issue 2
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links