Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: PJE
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: PJE
- From: Chris Sekiya <chris@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 09:43:59 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <13790.38377.53881.521998@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
On Sat, 22 Aug 1998, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Well, looking at the quotes above (all those stupid ">"), I can > certainly agree that clued-in users with flexible software is a > GoodThang[tm]. *laugh* One of these days I'll dust off my mailreader project. > Yet I don't agree with Chris that StarOffice is the start of a > slippery slope that leads to Linux-based spamming by clueless scum > with a Linux port of "The Stealth Mailer", with an intermediate stop > at double-CDROM-drive workstations so that when one auto-extruding > cupholder breaks, you don't drop your coffee mug. I'll let this one go past, as it's a subjective perception sort of thing. > jb> If a proprietary product that good comes along, > jb> then the Open Source authors, too, must innovate if they want > jb> to maintain market share. That's competition. That's good. > jb> That's the market system. That's good. > > Yeah, what he said. Chris? Hmmm. I'll take a stab at it. Most Open Source (as opposed to Free Software) coders wouldn't have bothered to code if a similar product were available. Linus, too -- I refer to his quote about the effect an available 386BSD would have had on his initial Linux work. Real-world example: JWP. Used to be the best/only Japanese wapuro on English Intel boxes. Source code was readily available. JWP died as soon as (hmmm, can't remember the name of the product -- memory is going) became available. There was no longer any point to JWP from the developer's point of view[1]. I fear that this will happen more and more frequently ... > You don't just hand out licenses to drive tractor-trailer rigs, and a > single Linux box is a potential instrument of mass destruction. (I am > not equating lives with spam or the Internet Worm, although today the > Worm could conceivably kill. However, once you factor out the value > of the entity at risk, Linux or any computer system multiplies the > danger in ways that a mechanical device cannot.) I wish that I'd have thought of the above ;) -- Chris [1] I don't think the X JWP project counts. It appears to be dead. Zero traffic on the mailing list (except for pings) since May or so. -------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 18 September, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Meeting: 10 October, Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate 12:30 -------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: PJE
- From: "Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" <chak@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: PJE
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: tlug: Linux Trademark: PHT position
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: Re: embedded linux (was: Trinux (sp?))
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: PJE
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: PJE
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links