tlug: Re: IMAP implementations

["Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>]

There was a mention of IMAP security issues.  That was with respect to
the UW implementation.  I don't see why IMAP as specified by the RFC
need be insecure (of course, one has to be careful about buffering,
requiring communication via netstrings or IMAP literals instead of
permitting ordinary strings would help, so IMAP could be better).

Anybody know anything about the CMU implementation (Cyrus, or
something like that)?

-- 
University of Tsukuba                Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences        Tel/fax: +1 (298) 53-5091
--------------------------------------------------------------
Next Nomikai: 18 September, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691
Next Meeting: 10 October, Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate 12:30
--------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp