Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: Bound Gimp manual?
- To: TLUG mailing list <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: tlug: Bound Gimp manual?
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1998 10:30:28 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.981005204104.20126D-100000@example.com>
- References: <13848.23157.161370.789217@example.com><Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.981005204104.20126D-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>>>>> "jb" == Jonathan Byrne <jq@example.com> writes: jb> On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >> Make two images, one with PNG (which supports a reasonable >> number of colors) and one with GIF, and let the users of >> proprietary image formats kiss them goodbye. jb> And I'm going to go to all the trouble to make sure of which jb> browser versions support which PNG features You should .... jb> Riiiiiiiiiight. :-) But I'm not even going to try to make you. However, please note for the future that HTTP does have a standard way to negotiate all kinds of features of the communication (language, image formats, encoding, bla bla) and I for one would like to see browsers smart enough to negotiate on my behalf (don't send me GIFs, I dislike them on principle; texts less than 1kB I want in Japanese, else English) and sites that respect my preferences. I imagine that most surfers will be push-model surfers for the forseeable future: "feed me lots of images and other pure-calorie zero-nutrient frosting and I'm happy." OTOH, people with the need to optimize time probably have money to spend. Maybe there's a niche for smart sites (ones that respect a user's "preference sheet" in the same way that browsers now can respect "style sheets"). jb> Oh, and since you seem to dislike bloated files, you should jb> disklike PNG, too - PNG files are typically far larger than jb> either a .gif or .jpg representation of a given image. Apples and oranges, my good man. 256-color PNGs compare favorably with 256-color GIFs in my (admittedly, very limited) experience; I know that when XEmacs eliminated all GIFs from etc/ in favor of PNG the du on that directory went down by about 4%, although the number of images increased by 2. zlib is a better compressor than LZW, although not much in this application. And 2-color PNGs beat both 256-color GIFs and any JPEG to _death_. But who cares? ;^) More to the point, my eyes are bad enough that I cannot distinguish between true-color and a 4096-color PNG. No banding, etc. But it's normally only about 3x-5x the size of a 256-color PNG or GIF. That's a very useful tradeoff, YMMV, of course. And PNG is lossless, at least for the application I have in mind (replacing GIF); if you're willing to lose information, of course JPEG is smaller. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +1 (298) 53-5091 --------------------------------------------------------------- Next Meeting: 10 October, 12:30 Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate Featuring the IMASY Eng. Team on "IPv6 - The Next Generation IP" Next Nomikai: 20 November, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 --------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- References:
- tlug: Bound Gimp manual?
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: tlug: Bound Gimp manual?
- From: Jonathan Byrne <jq@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: tlug: Linux for publishing? (ZD Net story)
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024 cylinders
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: Bound Gimp manual?
- Next by thread: tlug: software links
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links