Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- From: Shigeo Honda <shige@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1998 04:24:54 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
- Organization: Pastel Corporation
- References: <Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.981007002139.518A-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Jonathan Try this one. /sbin/lilo -v I think this operation updates MBR. > > My gut feeling is that for whatever reason, LILO didn't install in the MBR > on the new disk. What do I need to do from there to get it straightened > out? - Shigeo Honda --------------------------------------------------------------- Next Meeting: 10 October, 12:30 Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate Featuring the IMASY Eng. Team on "IPv6 - The Next Generation IP" Next Nomikai: 20 November, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 --------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- From: karlmax@example.com (Karl-Max Wagner)
- Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- References:
- tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- From: Jonathan Byrne <jq@example.com>
- tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- Prev by Date: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- Prev by thread: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |