Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]tlug: [tlug-admin: 763] Re: [tlug-admin: 756] Re: Updating the TLUG F
- To: tlug-admin@example.com
- Subject: tlug: [tlug-admin: 763] Re: [tlug-admin: 756] Re: Updating the TLUG F
- From: Kei Furuuchi <kfur@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 02:53:33 +0900 (JST)
- Cc: tlug@example.com
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <XFMail.981028004044.schweiz@example.com>
- References: <13877.47959.173424.42687@example.com><XFMail.981028004044.schweiz@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Jim Schweizer writes: > > On 27-Oct-98 Kei Furuuchi wrote: > > It is abuse of power to change faq without stating what 'trouble' is > > Interesting. You're saying that inviting public discussion about changes to a > public document is 'abuse of power'? No. Execute first, Question later attitude is 'abuse of power'. Why do you invite public discussion about things already decided and open to public beyond mailing list members? > > One aspect of the 'trouble' was a valued member of the TLUG main list > unsubscribed for reasons he made quite clear on the public list. But, Joe> > Chris demonstrated that in spades when he walked out sulking after a Joe> > couple of complaints were made about lack of software and inadequate Joe> > documentation. Joe> Joe> This remark is inappropriate and uncalled-for. Chris neither walked out Joe> (he is still an active member of Tlug) or "sulked". His opinion is Joe> different from yours, that's all. He never stops being an active member of Tlug. And you have a power to forcibily subscribe him to tlug mail list. So what seems to be 'trouble'? > > > or use mail addresses of mail list for other purpose without > > consulting addressee first. > > If you are talking about the *suprise* list for one of the founders of TLUG > and elected president of the group, you could have at any time asked to be > unsubscribed (did you?) or you could have joined in the spirit of the group and > tried to enjoy the occasion (which did you choose?). Yes. I really wanted to attend. Sorry I missed the oppotunity. I am going to attend the next time. But, that doesn't mean all of *suprise* list could and would attend. So it is polite to ask first if they wanted to be subscribed. > > > Isn't that obvious? > > <snip> > > No. To me, very little of your post is either constructive or > enlightening, let alone obvious.... > > > So please attack me on the idea. not factual correctiveness. > > No one will attack you. If you want attacks, I suggest you post to > alt.destroy.microsoft or another such group. Sorry attack remark offended you. it is supposed to be quoated from TJH's civility statement. I should add quotation marks. But, > > Isn't that obvious? > > The tlug-advocacy list will be available soon. I suggest all non-technical > topics be stopped until it is available. > > Regards, > > Jim S. > Now are we friends again? Regards, Kei. --------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 20 November, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Technical Meeting: January, 1999 (details TBA) --------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- References:
- tlug: [tlug-admin: 756] Re: Updating the TLUG FAQ
- From: Kei Furuuchi <kfur@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: tlug: [tlug-admin: 756] Re: Updating the TLUG FAQ
- Next by Date: tlug: pcmcia cameras?
- Prev by thread: tlug: [tlug-admin: 756] Re: Updating the TLUG FAQ
- Next by thread: tlug: forwarded message from Alan Cox
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links