Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: Re: limits of acceptability
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: Re: limits of acceptability
- From: Scott Stone <sstone@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 10:13:58 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.05.9812100951550.9111-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
On Thu, 10 Dec 1998, Chris Sekiya wrote: > On Wed, 9 Dec 1998, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > > He edits files by writing them to punch cards (barely acceptable) and > > then chewing on them (it's a shame they discontinued the cherry > > flavor, cards would be much more acceptable). > > I never liked cherry-flavor. Chocolate was much much better. > > > What they _should_ be doing (IMHO, and incidentally that of Debian), > > is to decide what they can handle and then let the user decide when to > > use the config tools and when to do bloody surgery on the rc file. > > ... and when they create a config file, it should be human-readable. > Extra points for comments in the config file. > > TL xconfigurator produces an X configuration file that is the bare-assed > minimum to get X running. Human-readable, if one is familiar with > XF86Config files, but not especially suited to after-the-fact editing. > > In contrast, xf86config produces an X configuration file that is > _extremely_ self-documented. Want to know what ChordMiddle does? Even if > it wasn't chosen during the config process, the description is in the > config file. Makes it much easier to edit, as well as explain to the > person standing behind you what is being changed and why. hm, I thought that all the comments were annoying so I deliberately took them out. It's easier (for me) to read the 'clean' config file output produced by turboxcfg. You think this was a mistake? I could easily have turboxcfg add some comments if you think it would help matters any. -------------------------------------------------- Scott M. Stone <sstone@example.com, sstone@example.com> Head of TurboLinux Development/Systems Administrator Pacific HiTech, Inc (USA) / Pacific HiTech, KK (Japan) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Next Technical Meeting: 12 December, 12:30 at Temple Univ. Japan *NEW LOCATION* a map is available at http://www.tuj.ac.jp/maps.html Next Nomikai: 15 January 1999, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 ------------------------------------------------------------------ more info: http://tlug.linux.or.jp Sponsor: PHT
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: Re: limits of acceptability
- From: Chris Sekiya <chris@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: Re: limits of acceptability
- From: Chris Sekiya <chris@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: Re: limits of acceptability
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: Re: limits of acceptability
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: Re: limits of acceptability
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: Re: limits of acceptability
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links