Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: valid mail address
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: valid mail address
- From: Dmytro Kovalev <kovald@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 12:09:19 +0900
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 25 Jan 1999 11:28:20 JST." <Pine.LNX.4.05.9901251121110.19982-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Sekiya <chris@example.com> writes: Chris> On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Jim Schweizer wrote: >> Is is valid to have quotes in an email address? >From rfc 822: 3.2. HEADER FIELD DEFINITIONS These rules show a field meta-syntax, without regard for the particular type or internal syntax. Their purpose is to permit detection of fields; also, they present to higher-level parsers an image of each field as fitting on one line. field = field-name ":" [ field-body ] CRLF field-name = 1*<any CHAR, excluding CTLs, SPACE, and ":"> field-body = field-body-contents [CRLF LWSP-char field-body] field-body-contents = <the ASCII characters making up the field-body, as defined in the following sections, and consisting of combinations of atom, quoted-string, and ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ specials tokens, or else consisting of texts> [...] and... [...] 3.4.5. QUOTED-STRINGS Where permitted (i.e., in words in structured fields) quoted- strings are treated as a single symbol. That is, a quoted- string is equivalent to an atom, syntactically. ^^^^^^^ So, it's allowed - dmytro Chris> I can't find this in the handy web RFC index, but a bit of Chris> empirical evidence: Chris> 220 trout.softek.co.jp ESMTP Sendmail Chris> 8.9.1a/SofTek-IN-1.0/R1 ready at Mon, 25 Jan 1999 11:18:02 Chris> +0900 (JST) helo softek.co.jp 250 trout.softek.co.jp Hello Chris> mikkabi.softek.co.jp [172.16.1.36], pleased to meet you Chris> mail From: <chris@example.com> 250 Chris> <chris@example.com>... Sender ok rcpt To: Chris> <"chris"@example.com> 250 Chris> <"chris"@example.com>... Recipient ok Chris> ... sendmail accepts it, so it may be considered valid. Chris> -- Chris Chris> ------------------------------------------------------------------- Chris> Next Technical Meeting: February 13 (Sat), 12:30 place: Chris> Temple Univ. ** presentation: XEmacs, by Steven Baur and Chris> Martin Buchholz Next Nomikai: March 19 (Fri), 19:30 Tengu Chris> TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Chris> ------------------------------------------------------------------- Chris> more info: http://tlug.linux.or.jp Sponsor: PHT ------------------------------------------------------------- Dmytro Kovalev Tokyo FI UNIX SA, Consultant E-mail: dmytro.kovalev@example.com -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Technical Meeting: February 13 (Sat), 12:30 place: Temple Univ. ** presentation: XEmacs, by Steven Baur and Martin Buchholz Next Nomikai: March 19 (Fri), 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 ------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://tlug.linux.or.jp Sponsor: PHT
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: valid mail address
- From: Chris Sekiya <chris@example.com>
- Re: tlug: valid mail address
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: tlug: valid mail address
- From: Darren Cook <darren@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: valid mail address
- From: Chris Sekiya <chris@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: valid mail address
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: valid mail address
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: valid mail address
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: valid mail address
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links