Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: 2.0 or 2.2?
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: 2.0 or 2.2?
- From: Tetsuji Rai <tetsuji@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 17:44:52 +0900
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 08 Mar 1999 13:19:09." <3.0.6.32.19990308131909.009c2960@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
> I've been reading the IP Masquerading how-to's: > http://www.tor.shaw.wave.ca/~ambrose/ipmasq-HOWTO.html > > There seem to be a number of differences between linux kernel 2.0 and 2.2. > For a new machine (intended as a firewall) is it best to use 2.2? > > Also, do the current distributions (Redhat, Turbo Linux) on sale in > Akihabara use kernel 2.2, or is it still 2.0? > > Darren I'm using kernel 2.2.2 on my RedHat 5.2 box. For me, 2.2 is better because more sound chips are supported (in my case ad1816a). I'm also use IP masquerading, but the setting is the same as 2.0.36. i believe current distributions are still 2.0. -Tetsuji Rai -- Tetsuji Rai PPL 2476457 http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Station/9416/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: March 19 (Fri), 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Technical Meeting: April 10 (Sat), 12:30 place: Temple Univ. ------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://tlug.linux.or.jp Sponsor: PHT
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: 2.0 or 2.2?
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- tlug: 2.0 or 2.2?
- From: Darren Cook <darren@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: RE: tlug: Unix Workstations
- Next by Date: tlug: misplaced libraries
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: 2.0 or 2.2?
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: 2.0 or 2.2?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links