Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: Accelerated X vs. Metro X
- To: TLUG mailing list <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: tlug: Accelerated X vs. Metro X
- From: Chris Sekiya <chris@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 13:37:28 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <001301be7068$3015d740$4100a8c0@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
On Wed, 17 Mar 1999, Daniel Saito wrote: > Has anyone looked into the performance ratio between these two? *laugh* Metro isn't really a going concern anymore, based on the infusion of Metro-donated code into XFree86. Accel beats other servers hands-down on chips for which docs are available only under NDA. However, their support sucks and they engage in extremely deceptive advertising practices. I would go with AccelX only if I had _no_ other choice[1]. -- Chris [1] Like if someone was holding a gun to my head. If the card isn't supported by XFree86, get a card that is. Do _not_ reward vendors who do not release unencumbered specs by purchasing their products. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: March 19 (Fri), 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Technical Meeting: April 10 (Sat), 12:30 place: Temple Univ. ------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan
- References:
- tlug: Accelerated X vs. Metro X
- From: "Daniel Saito" <daniel@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: POP3 question
- Next by Date: tlug: ReadKey.pm
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: Accelerated X vs. Metro X
- Next by thread: tlug: POP3 question
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links