Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]tlug: How to assess security risk [was: Cookies and Netscape]
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: tlug: How to assess security risk [was: Cookies and Netscape]
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 09:49:30 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <37B157E6.6DCF870D@example.com>
- References: <199908082117.VAA129164@example.com><37B0A1A7.6A446F84@example.com><14257.3190.324084.700677@example.com><37B157E6.6DCF870D@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>>>>> "Fredric" == Fredric Fredricson <Fredric.Fredriksson@example.com> writes: Fredric> My point is that cookies is not _THE_ threat to your Fredric> personal integrity that you face when you surf the Fredric> internet but just one of many. It all boils down to Fredric> personal preferences, of course, but to me cookies are Fredric> more useful than harmful, but this may be just me..... Nobody said they are _the_ threat AFAIK. Certainly not me. In practice, I think cookies are more useful than harmful, too. But it's not just a question of personal preferences; serious strategic analysis (very elementary, but in earnest nonetheless) applies here. The bad guys (both truly evil people and those who have taken one credit too many in a bad undergraduate business program) will push hard on the theoretical. I think that one important reason that cookie use is as restrained as it is is because some hoo-hah was made. Freedom _has_ been paid for by the blood of patriots.[1] Believe me, if the people mentioned above thought they could get away with it, they'd come up with mechanisms to upload your entire system configuration and any files that mention "money" to their corporate database. That is absolutely undeniable---because they've already done it. (The Prodigy scandal. Whatever method MS used to track that virus to its author.) The bottom line is that security risks are strategic uncertainty in the sense that historical frequency of abuse is no guide to future probability of abuse. Strategic uncertainty must be assessed in terms of _possibility_ of abuse and _benefit versus cost_ to abusers. Footnotes: [1] In this case, that's an exaggeration. "Blood" == miniscule additional risk of repetitive stress injury from typing the PRIVACY section of RFC 2109. ;-) -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ What are those two straight lines for? "Free software rules." ------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Technical Meeting: August 14 (Sat), 13:00 place: Temple Univ. *** Special guest: Marc Christensen (Salt Lake Linux Users Group) Next Nomikai: September 20 (Fri), 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 ------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan
- References:
- tlug: Cookies and Netscape
- From: "Subba Rao" <subb3@example.com>
- Re: tlug: Cookies and Netscape
- From: Fredric <fredric.fredriksson@example.com>
- Re: tlug: Cookies and Netscape
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: tlug: Cookies and Netscape
- From: Fredric Fredricson <Fredric.Fredriksson@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: tlug: Components / Net Access
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: Components / Net Access
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: Cookies and Netscape
- Next by thread: tlug: Authentication
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links