Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: Redhat 6.1: (Bad) First Impressions
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: Redhat 6.1: (Bad) First Impressions
- From: "Frank Bennett (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCJVUlaSVzJS8kWSVNJUMlSBsoQg==?= )" <bennett@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 12:47:14 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9910110324520.28260-100000@example.com>; from Simon Cozens on Mon, Oct 11, 1999 at 03:50:25AM +0100
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9910110324520.28260-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
On Mon, Oct 11, 1999 at 03:50:25AM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: > > This routine upgrade turned into a nightmare > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Ah, that'd be your problem, then. > > You've just learnt the reason why `If it ain't broke, don't fix it. > <cue rant about Debian users who daily upgrade everything to the latest > devel versions and complain when things don't work> > > (To be fair there are RedHat users who do this too, but apt-get makes it > easy. Then there are people who *NEED* to run the latest devel kernel with > AC prepatches...) Setting aside the accusatory remarks, this actually reinforces my point. Because this work was anticipated in advance, users expected service to be interrupted on that day. If we had been looking at an emergency repair, it could have gone much harder for them. I didn't mean for my posting to trigger a most-favoured-distro dispute, so perhaps I should put a little emphasis on my original point. This was, in fact, our first experience with Debian here, and I have no doubt that RedHat's apt-get is a fine piece of administrative software. But we found it impossible to install the operating system which it is designed to support, because the RedHat installation script failed in normal use. Whether the original OS had been broken or not, it no longer existed, and we had to choose a distro to fix. We chose Debian, not because of its package manager, but because it was easier to hack its installation disks to suit our needs. Cheers, -- -x80 Frank G Bennett, Jr @@ Faculty of Law, Nagoya Univ () email: bennett@example.com Tel: +81[(0)52]789-2239 () WWW: http://rumple.soas.ac.uk/~bennett/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Technical Meeting: October 9 (Sat), 13:30 place: Temple Univ. * Linux Internationalisation Initiative (Li18nux) speaker: Akio Kido * Japanese TrueType Fonts speaker: Adrian Havill Next Technical Meeting: November 13 (Sat), 13:30 place: Temple Univ. * Network Security speaker: Steve Baur Next Nomikai: December 17 (Fri), 19:00 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 ------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan
- References:
- Re: tlug: Redhat 6.1: (Bad) First Impressions
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: Sparc ramdisks
- Next by Date: tlug: Re: libwcsmbs
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: Redhat 6.1: (Bad) First Impressions
- Next by thread: tlug: gcc use
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links