Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]RE: tlug: Can you believe this?
- To: <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: RE: tlug: Can you believe this?
- From: "Frank Bennett" <bennett@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 16:41:05 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-2022-jp"
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
If I were Microsoft ... >Linux with Microsoftware piled thick on top is going to look, feel and >act like just another Microsoftware, except that Microsoft is going to >treat you as a second-class citizen for refusing to use their >kernel This is a tricky one for them. Steve Turnbull referred to struggles over design between the Word and OS divisions at MS, which left the OS division with unhappy compromises on their hands. The worry I think is that a similar thing would happen with whatever Linux distro they stack their applications onto. User complaints would get addressed, but (either by intention or out of benign laziness) sometimes by strongarming things at the OS level in ways that constrict its utility for other applications. Stacking Office or whatever on top of a Linux distro would present MS with a different flavor of a dilemma they already face; at present, if things don't work in ways that cause lots of users pain, MS can't blame the OS because they wrote the OS. With Linux, they can't credibly scapegoat the OS because its source is open and theirs is not; to make things stick, they would have to get down to specifics, and then whatever problem it is would be either fixed, or tossed back into their own court by the community. >Lastly, on a tangentially relevant issue, there is the question of >cost: if Microsoft prices Office for Linux in line with other >platforms, it is going to charge Y50000 or more for the >package. (They're going to have to price Office for Linux the same as >Office for Windows if they don't want mass exodus of Win98 users to >Linux This is a tricky one too. The temptation for the Word division (or whatever) at MS would be to charge *more* for the Linux version. They might give the attitude toward copying among free software fans as their reason, but in fact the core incentive is to capture the value of the work that has gone into the OS for themselves. Software is not price solely on development cost, but on what the market will bear; and if the user isn't paying the community for the OS, he might as well pay MS. Or so I would reason if I were in their shoes. Cheers, Frank B ------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: December 17 (Fri), 20:00 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Technical Meeting: January 14 (Fri) 19:00 * Topic: "glibc - current status and future developments" * Guest Speaker: Ulrich Drepper (Cygnus Solutions) * Place: Oracle Japan HQ 12F Seminar Room (New Otani Garden Court) ------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: Can you believe this?
- Next by Date: RE: tlug: Can you believe this?
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: Can you believe this?
- Next by thread: tlug: drepper@example.com footer
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links