Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [Lingo] Grizzles (Was: Re: jgram.org - Japanese grammar database)
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 08:52:43 +0200
- From: Godwin Stewart <godwin.stewart@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [Lingo] Grizzles (Was: Re: jgram.org - Japanese grammar database)
- References: <200609060008.k8608ILW024824@nexus.csse.monash.edu.au> <20060906064413.a23de8d8.godwin.stewart@gmail.com> <20060906061308.GA2035@nexus.csse.monash.edu.au>
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 16:13:08 +1000, Jim Breen <jim.breen@example.com> wrote: > Is this better? (Trying a different client. I think it has > left the "In-Reply-To", but I can't see any "References".) Much better. The References: header is less important in e-mail than in usenet. If an In-Reply-To: header is missing from a reply then your MUA should fall back onto the References: header to try and reconstruct the thread. You've also got rid of that nasty Reply-To: header while you were at it. -- G. Stewart - godwin.stewart@example.com Real programmers don't write in FORTRAN. FORTRAN is for pipe stress freaks and crystallography weenies. FORTRAN is for wimp engineers who wear white socks.Attachment: pgpWT4xLw2EWb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: [Lingo] Grizzles (Was: Re: jgram.org - Japanese grammar database)
- From: Jim Breen
- Re: [Lingo] Grizzles (Was: Re: jgram.org - Japanese grammar database)
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [Lingo] Grizzles (Was: Re: jgram.org - Japanese grammar database)
- From: Jim Breen
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [Lingo] Grizzles (Was: Re: jgram.org - Japanese grammar database)
- Next by Date: [Lingo] [NL] Word order
- Previous by thread: Re: [Lingo] Grizzles (Was: Re: jgram.org - Japanese grammar database)
- Next by thread: [Lingo] [NL] Word order
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links