Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: swap partition too small
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: swap partition too small
- From: Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 23:36:58 +0900
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007122321441.6095-100000@example.com>; from devin@example.com on Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 11:25:12PM +0900
- References: <20000712215513.A22940@example.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007122321441.6095-100000@example.com>
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.2i
On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 11:25:12PM +0900, Tod McQuillin wrote: > Why does linux have to have its swap space initialised with mkswap before > use? Most other unix just starts scribbling on the swap without concern > for what's there already. The original idea was to keep one from accidentally using a non-swap partition as swap. <heresy> Of course, that's only half of the check. Having the kernel check for a valid swap signature is all well and good, but it's also rather important that mkswap verifies that the target partition type is 0x82 ... but, of course, that would _never_ happen so such a sanity check is clearly unnecessary ;) <\heresy> -- Chris
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: swap partition too small
- From: Tod McQuillin <devin@example.com>
- References:
- Re: swap partition too small
- From: Jim Tittsler <jwt-tlug@example.com>
- Re: swap partition too small
- From: Tod McQuillin <devin@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: swap partition too small
- Next by Date: Re: swap partition too small
- Prev by thread: Re: swap partition too small
- Next by thread: Re: swap partition too small
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links