Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Installing old libc
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Installing old libc
- From: SL Baur <steve@example.com>
- Date: 30 Aug 2000 14:07:02 +0900
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: Antony Stace's message of "Wed, 30 Aug 2000 12:37:15 +0900"
- Mail-Copies-To: never
- References: <39AA88C6.57B3D0DC@example.com> <39AC816B.D6520594@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <o2aJB.A.oBC.fgJr5@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Antony Stace <antony@example.com> writes in tlug@example.com: > Hi > I have a program(An old quake :) ) that says it needs an old libm, > libm.so.5 > If I install a rpm package with this file in it, will it remove my > current libm? Under any reasonable circumstances, no. > I had a look at the current libm library and it is symbolic link > to /lib/libm-2.1.3.so , so I made a link from this to lib.so.5. As the other Steve wrote, don't do this. > But still no go :(. How can I work out which rpm package has the > libm.so.5 file in it Beyond guessing, I don't know. We call it `libc5-compat'.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Installing old libc
- From: Jim Tittsler <jwt-tlug@example.com>
- References:
- Writing japanese with LaTeX
- From: Laurent Marzullo <Laurent.Marzullo@example.com>
- Installing old libc
- From: Antony Stace <antony@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Installing old libc
- Next by Date: Re: Installing old libc
- Prev by thread: Installing old libc
- Next by thread: Re: Installing old libc
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links