Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Installing old libc
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Installing old libc
- From: Jim Tittsler <jwt-tlug@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:33:45 +0900
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <m27l8zpcax.fsf@example.com>; from steve@example.com on Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 02:07:02PM +0900
- Organization: 7J1AJH/AI8A Tokyo
- References: <39AA88C6.57B3D0DC@example.com> <39AC816B.D6520594@example.com> <m27l8zpcax.fsf@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <H2dwWD.A.pDC.m5Jr5@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 02:07:02PM +0900, SL Baur wrote: > Antony Stace <antony@example.com> writes in tlug@example.com: > > But still no go :(. How can I work out which rpm package has the > > libm.so.5 file in it > > Beyond guessing, I don't know. We call it `libc5-compat'. I think RedHat keeps it in libc-5.3.12-*. 'rpmfind' is a neat tool that can reduce guessing (particularly if you are using RedHat or SuSE). You could do something like: rpmfind --dist redhat libm.so.5 http://www.rpmfind.org/ (and if you have a recent RedHat/SuSE, you probably already have the rpmfind client) -- Jim Tittsler, Tokyo ICQ: 5981586
- References:
- Writing japanese with LaTeX
- From: Laurent Marzullo <Laurent.Marzullo@example.com>
- Installing old libc
- From: Antony Stace <antony@example.com>
- Re: Installing old libc
- From: SL Baur <steve@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Installing old libc
- Next by Date: What happens when you do `rm -rf /' on Linux?
- Prev by thread: Re: Installing old libc
- Next by thread: What happens when you do `rm -rf /' on Linux?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links