Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Slow browsing?
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Slow browsing?
- From: shimpei@example.com
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 13:24:58 +0900
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <ekUFK.A.LPC.NGuy5@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
> I can't compare it with IE, though. The little I've used IE has been > on my wife's box which is very differently configured from any of mine > (notably being on the wrong side of a modem from the internet). IE feels faster than Netscape, and possibly crashes less often. However, Netscape doesn't take your entire desktop with it when it crashes (a calamity whose probability you can only partially reduce by forcing each IE window to run in separate processes). My experience with IE makes me somewhat wary of Nautilus's attempt to integrate Gecko into the file browser. [1] > Lynx remains my browser of choice; w3.el is almost getting there, > though. Ew. w3.el is morally wrong (though, I have to admit, very useful in some situations). Shimpei. [1] But at least you have a decent CLI shell in Unix. In Windows it's very hard *not* to deal with IE.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slow browsing?
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Vocabulary test
- Next by Date: Re: Slow browsing?
- Prev by thread: Slow browsing?
- Next by thread: Re: Slow browsing?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links