Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- From: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 15:10:11 +0200
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Delivered-To: tlug@example.com
- Fortune: Your reasoning is excellent -- it's only your basic assumptions that are wrong.
- In-Reply-To: <15228.32466.470584.418429@example.com>
- List-Help: <mailto:tlug-request@example.comsubject=help>
- List-Post: <mailto:tlug@example.com>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:tlug-request@example.comsubject=subscribe>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tlug-request@example.comsubject=unsubscribe>
- Mail-Followup-To: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>, tlug@example.com
- Old-Return-Path: <ranma@example.com>
- References: <F124FRaqbC8wSA1XvpF000090ae@example.com> <15227.39771.9000.307909@example.com> <3B7BA029.80DFE032@example.com> <15228.32466.470584.418429@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <4EDkbB.A.3OB.heRf7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- Sender: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > A P120 + PCI + IDE + 32MB combo didn't give better performance You did enable Busmaster DMA transfers using hdparm -d1, did you ? I get 3MB/sec using the default hd settings (16bit I/0, unmaskirq=off, dma=off, if the kernel does not use dma by default, which seems to be enabled in newer 2.4 kernels). 6MB/sec with unmaskirq and 32bit I/0. 20MB/sec with unmaskirq and busmaster dma. (On a Maxtor 40GB 5400 rpm disk) In contrast to that I get only 20MB/sec on our RAID5 SCSI we use for one of our Servers at my university (Combined space is 229GB, IBM IDE disks, rpm unknown, external Tower with integrated controller, attached to the server using an adaptec AIC7XXX scsi controller). I suspect that either the raid controller or the scsi interface card is the bottleneck here... -- Tobias PGP-Key: 0x9AC7E0BC
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- From: "Jean-Christian Imbeault" <jean_christian@example.com>
- IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- From: "A.Sajjad Zaidi" <sajjad@example.com>
- Re: IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Inserting a module at boot in RH7.1
- Next by Date: RE: .config
- Prev by thread: Re: IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- Next by thread: Re: IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links