Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Inputting both kanji and Latin-1?
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:18:18 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Inputting both kanji and Latin-1?
- References: <20040202111912.GC2028@example.com><Pine.GSO.4.58.0402021505150.11751@example.com><20040206151554.GA3669@example.com><87znbvv80v.fsf@example.com><20040210101601.GB2385@example.com><20040210112612.GB21921@example.com>
- Organization: The XEmacs Project
- User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.5 (celeriac, linux)
>>>>> "Scott" == Scott <scottro@example.com> writes: Scott> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 11:16:01AM +0100, David Santinoli Scott> wrote: >> How do I know for sure whether my vim is Canna-ized or not? I >> started the Canna server (but not kinput2), then fired up vim >> in a Japanese locale and tried to input kanji the usual way >> (shift+space), failing. Does this imply that Canna support is >> absent, and that I need to get the "Increase Your Vimhood" >> patch? Scott> To input kanji (or kana) you would have to have kinput2 Scott> running as well. If kinput is running but not canna, you Scott> would be able to input hiragana, but not get any kanji. False. The reason for suggesting a Canna-ized application is to get kinput2 and XIM out of the way. BTW, I don't know how to determine if a vi-family app is canna-ized. AFAIK it's a separate patch, so your distro probably has a vim-canna package. Eg, bash-2.05b$ dpkg -l '*vi*canna*' Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-==============-==============-============================================ pn jvim-canna <none> (no description available) pn nvi-m17n-canna <none> (no description available) so it looks like vanilla vim doesn't do Canna in Debian. In the long run I think the IIIMF protocol for IMs is much better, and eventually XFree86 will probably support it or another improved IM protocol natively even if it's not X11 standard. (Sorry, since the book got published I've become lazy about actually trying things, since XEmacs works so well for my style.) -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Inputting both kanji and Latin-1?
- From: Scott
- References:
- [tlug] Inputting both kanji and Latin-1?
- From: David Santinoli
- Re: [tlug] Inputting both kanji and Latin-1?
- From: Tapio Peltonen
- Re: [tlug] Inputting both kanji and Latin-1?
- From: David Santinoli
- Re: [tlug] Inputting both kanji and Latin-1?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Inputting both kanji and Latin-1?
- From: David Santinoli
- Re: [tlug] Inputting both kanji and Latin-1?
- From: Scott
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] {JOB} Tequila Japan
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Re: is there a real possibility that Sco get what it claims?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Inputting both kanji and Latin-1?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Inputting both kanji and Latin-1?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links